$1.4M LifeLine Health Screening Class Action Settlement

$1.4M LifeLine Health Screening Class Action Settlement

By Steve Levine

Life Line Screening Pixel Tracking Class Action Settlement

Published: February 12, 2026

Claim Form Deadline: February 17, 2026

Cash Payment: $20 - $50 (California)

Settlement Fund: $1.4M


If you've ever used Life Line Screening's website to schedule a health screening or buy a test kit, the company may have been quietly sending your medical choices to Facebook and Google without your knowledge.

A $1.4 million class action settlement has been reached, and anyone who used Life Line's website since June 1, 2018 can claim $20 (or $50 if you're a California resident). No documentation is needed — just a simple claim form.

What Is Life Line Screening?

You've probably seen their ads in local newspapers, church bulletins, or community center flyers. Life Line Screening is a company that sets up preventive health screening events at churches, VFW halls, community centers, and other local venues around the country. They offer tests that check for things like clogged arteries, aneurysms, irregular heartbeat, bone density loss, and other conditions that often go undetected until something goes seriously wrong.

Their target audience is mostly older adults — people over 50 who want peace of mind about their cardiovascular health, stroke risk, or other age-related concerns. The screenings are typically marketed as affordable alternatives to expensive hospital visits, usually costing somewhere between $60 and $200 depending on which package you choose.

To book a screening or buy a home test kit, you go to Life Line's website. That's where you browse the available tests, select the ones you want (like a carotid artery screening for stroke risk or an abdominal ultrasound for aortic aneurysm), pick a date and location near you, and pay online. The key detail here is that every click, every test you select, and every search you run on their site tells a story about your personal health concerns.

And according to this lawsuit, that story was being shared with Facebook and Google.

What Are Tracking Pixels?

If you're not sure what a "tracking pixel" is, you're not alone — most people have never heard the term, even though they encounter them on nearly every website they visit.

A tracking pixel is a tiny, invisible piece of code that a website embeds in its pages. You can't see it — it's literally a 1x1 pixel, the smallest possible image, completely invisible to the naked eye. But when your browser loads that pixel, it sends a signal back to whoever put it there (in this case, Meta and Google) saying: "This person just visited this page, clicked this button, searched for this term, or added this item to their cart."

On a shopping website, tracking pixels help advertisers know that you looked at a pair of running shoes, so they can show you running shoe ads on Facebook later. That's annoying, but relatively harmless.

On a health screening website, it's a completely different story.

When Life Line Screening installed Meta's pixel and Google's tracking code on its website, the lawsuit alleges it meant that every time you:

• Typed something like "stroke screening" or "heart disease" into the site's search bar
• Selected a carotid artery ultrasound or abdominal aortic aneurysm test
• Added a screening package to your cart or completed a purchase
• Browsed pages about specific health conditions

…that information was being transmitted directly to Facebook and Google in real time. These companies then had a record of your specific health concerns, tied to your identity through cookies, device IDs, or your logged-in Facebook/Google account.

You never agreed to this. You probably didn't even know it was happening. You thought you were privately scheduling a health test — not broadcasting your medical concerns to the world's largest advertising platforms.

What Could Facebook and Google Do With This Data?

Once your health screening activity reaches Meta's or Google's servers, it becomes part of their advertising ecosystem. Here's what that can look like in practice:

• Facebook could build an advertising profile that flags you as interested in cardiovascular health, stroke prevention, or cancer screening — and sell access to that profile to advertisers
• You might start seeing targeted ads for heart medications, life insurance, or medical alert systems based on the screenings you selected
• Your data could be combined with other information Meta and Google already have about you (your age, location, browsing history) to create an increasingly detailed health profile
• Advertisers in the health, pharmaceutical, and insurance industries can use these profiles to target you with ads based on conditions you haven't even discussed with your own doctor yet

The fundamental problem is that you went to a health website expecting medical privacy, and instead your health concerns were fed into an advertising machine.

Why This Is Part of a Bigger Problem

This isn't an isolated case. Dozens of hospitals, telehealth companies, pharmacies, and medical testing providers have been caught using Meta and Google tracking pixels that share sensitive health information with advertising platforms. The practice became widespread because these pixels are easy to install, they're free, and they help companies measure how well their online advertising is working. Most businesses that installed them probably didn't fully understand what data was being shared — but that doesn't change the fact that it was shared.

Life Line Screening denies any wrongdoing, and the court has not made any determination of liability. The case is Mediate v. Life Line Screening of America, Ltd., Cause No. D-1-GN-25-000401, in the District Court of Travis County, Texas.

Who Qualifies?

There are two subclasses:

Nationwide Class: All individuals who set health screenings through Life Line, or purchased test kits through Life Line, using a website or web platform during the period from June 1, 2018 to the present.

California Class: All individuals residing in California who set health screenings through Life Line, or purchased test kits through Life Line, using a website or web platform during the same period.

How Much Can I Get?

Nationwide class members: $20 cash payment
California residents: $50 cash payment (in recognition of additional California privacy law claims being released)

If you're a California resident, you must choose one or the other — you cannot claim both the $20 and $50 payments.

The total settlement fund is $1,400,000, which covers class member payments and settlement administration costs. Attorneys' fees (up to $800,000) and the service award (up to $3,500) are paid by the defendant separately and do not reduce the settlement fund.

How Do I File a Claim?

Online: Submit your claim at lifelinepixelsettlement.com (required for electronic payment)
By mail: Send your completed claim form to: Life Line Pixel Settlement Administration, c/o Kroll Settlement Administration LLC, P.O. Box 225391, New York, NY 10150-5391

Deadline: February 17, 2026 (submitted online or postmarked by mail).

No documentation is required. Just fill out the claim form indicating that you used Life Line's website to set screenings or purchase test kits during the class period.

File Your Claim Now


What Happens If I Do Nothing?

If you do nothing, you will not receive any cash payment. Your legal claims against Life Line Screening over the pixel tracking issues will be released, meaning you give up the right to sue. Since the claim requires no documentation at all, there's no reason not to file.

Important Dates


Class Period: June 1, 2018 – present
Opt-Out Deadline: February 2, 2026 (passed)
Objection Deadline: February 2, 2026 (passed)
Claim Form Deadline: February 17, 2026
Final Approval Hearing: March 12, 2026 at 9:00 AM CT (via Zoom)

Attorneys' Fees and Service Awards

Class Counsel (John J. Nelson of Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman PLLC and Jonathan Jagher of Freed Kanner London & Millen LLC) may receive up to $800,000 in fees and expenses, paid by the defendant separately from the settlement fund. The class representative (Rocco Mediate) may receive up to $3,500 in a service award, also paid separately. These fees do not reduce the $1.4 million available for class member payments and administration.

File Your Claim Before Feb 17


How Do I Find Class Action Settlements?

Find all the latest class actions you can qualify for by getting notified of new lawsuits as soon as they are open to claims:



Case Information

The case is Mediate v. Life Line Screening of America, Ltd., Cause No. D-1-GN-25-000401, in the District Court of Travis County, Texas, 261st Judicial District, before Judge Daniella Deseta Lyttle.

Class Counsel: John J. Nelson of Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman PLLC and Jonathan Jagher of Freed Kanner London & Millen LLC.

Settlement Administrator: Kroll Settlement Administration LLC, P.O. Box 225391, New York, NY 10150-5391.

Settlement Notice

Your browser does not support viewing PDFs inline. Download the PDF.



Sources

• Class Action Settlement Notice, Mediate v. Life Line Screening of America, Ltd., Cause No. D-1-GN-25-000401 (Travis County, TX)
• Settlement Website: lifelinepixelsettlement.com

Filing Class Action Settlement Claims

Please submit only truthful and accurate claims. Submitting false information can result in denial of benefits and potential penalties. If you are unsure whether you qualify, review the official notice or contact Class Counsel. OpenClassActions.com is a consumer news site and is not the settlement administrator or a law firm.

For more class actions keep scrolling below.
Class Action Summary
Status Proposed Settlement — Awaiting Final Approval
Claim Deadline February 17, 2026
Settlement Fund $1,400,000
Nationwide Payment $20 per person
California Payment $50 per person
Category Privacy / Pixel Tracking / Health Data
Third Parties Meta (Facebook) and Google
Class Period June 1, 2018 – present
Defendant Life Line Screening of America, Ltd.
Case Number D-1-GN-25-000401
Court District Court of Travis County, Texas (261st Judicial District)
Judge Hon. Daniella Deseta Lyttle
Final Approval Hearing March 12, 2026 at 9:00 AM CT (via Zoom)
Attorneys' Fees Up to $800,000 — paid by defendant separately from fund
Claim Website Lifeline Pixel Settlement Site