Claims are closed. The February 2, 2026 deadline has passed. The official website lists a March 17, 2026 final approval hearing but does not post the court’s result or a payment date.
Claims are closed. The February 2, 2026 deadline has passed. The official website lists a March 17, 2026 final approval hearing but does not post the court’s result or a payment date.
StatusFinal-Approval Update PendingSee the current-status update above.
Claim DeadlineFebruary 2, 2026The filing window has passed.
Settlement Fund$7.75 millionDeductions are governed by court orders.
Potential BenefitAbout $50 or up to $5,000Benefit rules varied by claim type.
What Happened?
The lawsuit concerned a February 2023 incident that allegedly affected personal information maintained by Purpose Financial and Advance America. The defendant denied the allegations, liability, and wrongdoing. The parties agreed to settle to avoid the cost, delay, and uncertainty of continued litigation.
Who Was Covered?
The settlement covered people who received notice that their information was implicated in the February 2023 Purpose Financial incident.
What Benefits Were Available?
Class members could request an estimated $50 pro rata cash payment, an additional estimated $50 for qualifying California residents, or up to $5,000 for documented out-of-pocket losses.
How Claims Were Filed
During the filing period, eligible class members could submit a claim through the official settlement website or use the paper form made available by the administrator. Documentation requirements depended on the benefit selected. The filing window is now closed.
• Final approval hearing: March 17, 2026
• Claim deadline: February 2, 2026
• Payment date: Not announced
Settlement Fund and Legal Fees
Court-approved notice, administration, legal-fee, expense, and other permitted amounts are governed by the settlement documents and court orders. Those deductions can affect the amount available for eligible claims.
Case Information
The case is Hernandez, et al. v. Purpose Financial, Inc., et al., Case No. 7:23-cv-04256-JDA, in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina.