Judge Beth Labson Freeman signed the order granting final approval on October 13, 2026, twelve days after the October 1 hearing. The same order decided Class Counsel's fee request and every class member objection. Approval does not start payments by itself: a judgment has to be entered first, and any appeal has to run its course.
The settlement resolves In re Google Assistant Privacy Litigation, Case No. 5:19-cv-04286-BLF, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California before Judge Beth Labson Freeman. The plaintiffs allege that Google Assistant devices recorded people after "false accepts," when a device wrongly detected a hot word, and that some of those recordings went to third-party reviewers. Google denies the allegations and is settling without admitting wrongdoing. The Settlement Administrator is A.B. Data, Ltd.
Free settlement alerts
Get notified when new class actions open to claims
Join thousands of readers who get the latest class action settlements you may qualify for — delivered straight to your inbox.
Status
Final Approval Granted — Payments Pending
approved October 13, 2026 · claims closed · no new claims accepted
Claim Deadline
August 27, 2026 (passed)
the opt-out and objection deadlines closed the same day
Next Step
Entry of Judgment
the Court directed Class Counsel to submit a proposed judgment · any appeal runs from the judgment
Estimated Payout
$8–$20 per point · about $32–$80 per device · $8–$20 Privacy Class
preliminary Settlement Administrator estimate filed September 17, 2026 · subject to change
Payment Date
Not announced
payments follow entry of judgment and the end of any appeal
Update · October 13, 2026
The Court granted final approval on October 13, 2026 (ECF No. 584). It awarded Class Counsel the one-third fee they requested, $22,666,666.70, plus $1,021,738.40 in expenses, cut the service awards from $10,000 to $5,000 each, and overruled all seven objections. The Settlement Administrator's preliminary estimate of about $8 to $20 per point, filed September 17, 2026, remains the latest per-point figure in the court record. No payment date had been announced as of October 13, 2026. For the settlement's full terms, see our
Google Assistant privacy settlement page.
Judge Freeman's 31-page order (ECF No. 584) found the settlement fair, reasonable and adequate under Rule 23 and resolved the fee motion in the same ruling:
- Settlement approved: the $68 million non-reversionary fund and the Plan of Allocation, including the point system and the three-device cap.
- Attorneys' fees: $22,666,666.70, the one-third of the fund Class Counsel requested. The Court called that an upward departure from the Ninth Circuit's 25% benchmark and found it justified by the result and the risk of the case. For its lodestar cross-check it lowered the hourly rates of four senior attorneys, including a requested $3,000 rate it called patently unreasonable, to $1,600; the fee still came to about 1.01 times the adjusted value of the 20,371.6 hours Class Counsel recorded.
- Expenses: $1,021,738.40, as requested, for costs over more than six years of litigation, including experts, mediation and e-discovery.
- Service awards: $5,000 for each of the four class representatives, half the $10,000 requested. The Court found $10,000 out of proportion to what individual class members are expected to receive.
- Objections: all seven were overruled; the details are below.
- Claims and opt-outs: the order counts more than 1.49 million timely claims, more than 40,000 late claims and 217 valid exclusion requests, an opt-out rate under 0.015%.
- Next step: Class Counsel must submit a proposed judgment with the list of people who opted out. Judgment had not been entered as of October 13, 2026.
The order also recounts the notice campaign: email notice to 173,814,291 addresses with a 98.76% delivery rate, a reminder email, and a settlement website that drew about 5.19 million visits from about 1.96 million unique users.
On September 17, 2026, Class Counsel filed their reply in support of final approval (ECF No. 574), with a supplemental declaration from A.B. Data. Those filings give the first administrator-sourced payout figures in the case:
- Claims filed: more than 1.49 million timely claims and more than 40,000 late claims, which A.B. Data has discretion to accept under the Settlement Agreement. The declaration's preliminary count is 1,536,964 claimants.
- Device claims: about 85% of claimants gave at least one serial number or IMEI, and Purchaser Class claims list 1.35 devices on average.
- Estimated value per point: about $8 to $20. The administrator says those figures are preliminary and may change after it finishes validating claims, including removing duplicate, incomplete and potentially fraudulent submissions.
- Minimum payment: based on current claims, the Alternative Minimum Payment in the Plan of Allocation is not expected to be needed.
- Opt-outs and objections: 216 valid requests for exclusion and six objections from class members at that point; the final approval order counts 217 exclusions and seven objections. No government official objected after notice under the Class Action Fairness Act.
- Notice reach: email notice was delivered to about 99% of 173,814,291 addresses on the Direct Notice List, and a reminder email went to people who had not yet filed a claim or opted out, also delivered at about a 99% rate.
Applied to the point system, the administrator's range works out as follows (our arithmetic, based on the preliminary estimate):
- Privacy-only claim (1 point): about $8 to $20
- One Google-Made Device (4 points): about $32 to $80
- One device plus the Privacy Class (5 points): about $40 to $100
- Maximum claim, three devices plus the Privacy Class (13 points): about $104 to $260
The estimate footnote in the declaration assumes a Net Settlement Fund of about $40 million after fees and costs; any additional fees, expenses or deductions would lower the figures proportionally. The fee and expense awards in the October 13 order were no larger than requested. Actual payments depend on the final count of valid claims.
Seven class members objected. The Court overruled every objection, though it agreed in part with the fee objections and took them into account in its own review of Class Counsel's billing. The main arguments and rulings:
- Attorneys' fees: five objections challenged the fee, some arguing that one-third exceeds the Ninth Circuit's 25% benchmark. The Court called parts of those objections well taken, lowered several attorneys' hourly rates in its lodestar cross-check, and still found one-third reasonable because the adjusted cross-check came to about 1.01, meaning Class Counsel recover barely any premium over the hours they recorded. It found no sign of collusion: Google did not agree in advance not to oppose the fee, and unawarded fees would not revert to Google. One fee objection appeared to be aimed at a different Google case.
- Device cap and serial numbers: objectors challenged the three-device cap and the requirement to give a serial number or IMEI in addition to proof of purchase. The Court found the cap had a rational basis tied to device lifespans, noted that owners of more devices could have opted out, and held the serial-number requirement a reasonable fraud-prevention measure rather than an undue burden.
- Settlement value: one objector argued the $68 million undervalues the claims using a different damages measure. The Court found the argument unsupported by expert evidence and noted the recovery equals about 15% to 57% of Class Counsel's estimate of maximum damages, with real risk at summary judgment, trial and on appeal; the Privacy Class had been denied certification as a litigation class.
- Claim rate and cy pres: one objection said almost all of the 171 million notified people would receive nothing and faulted the settlement for not naming a charity to receive leftover money. The Court said the notice population is not the class size, pointed to the 1.49 million timely claims, and explained that leftover funds are redistributed to claimants until another distribution is no longer economical, with any charity requiring the Court's separate approval.
- Other objections: one raised general data-privacy grievances without a specific objection to the settlement; another said the objector could not supply serial numbers or proof of purchase, that her children were minors when the devices were used, and that the Plan of Allocation was unspecified. The Court found the proof requirements justified, noted that the children are now adults who could have filed their own Privacy Class claims, and pointed to the Plan of Allocation posted on the settlement website.
Claimants who already filed have nothing further to submit unless the Settlement Administrator contacts them. The remaining steps belong to the Court, the parties and A.B. Data:
- Judgment: the order directs Class Counsel to submit a proposed judgment that attaches the list of people who opted out. The Court then enters final judgment.
- Appeal window: in federal civil cases a notice of appeal is generally due within 30 days after judgment is entered. Objectors whose objections were overruled can appeal, and an appeal can hold up payments while it is pending.
- Claim review: A.B. Data reviews submitted claims against the settlement's requirements, including duplicate and potentially fraudulent submissions, and may contact claimants if it needs more information.
- Payments: once the settlement becomes effective and review is complete, the administrator sets the final per-point value and pays authorized claimants.
The official settlement website, GoogleAssistantPrivacyLitigation.com, is where the judgment and any payment timeline will be posted.
There is no official payment date. No payment date had been announced as of October 13, 2026. Final approval was granted that day, but money goes out only after judgment is entered and any appeal is resolved.
Timing after that depends on things nobody can forecast yet: whether anyone appeals, how long an appeal takes, and how long the administrator needs to finish claim review. A payment date that does not come from the official settlement website is a guess.
Payment communications are expected to be sent digitally by email or text message. The final approval order lists the payment options as direct electronic transfer by ACH, Zelle, Venmo or PayPal, or a check, based on the choice made on the claim form.
A.B. Data contacted class members by email during the claim period, including a REMINDER round that carried a Unique ID and PIN and landed in many spam and promotions folders. Once the case moves toward payments, claimants can expect more email or text contact. That is also when fake "settlement payment" messages tend to appear.
How to handle any message about your Google Assistant payment:
- Check your spam, junk and promotions folders so you do not miss a real message.
- Do not click links or buttons in a message you are unsure about. Type GoogleAssistantPrivacyLitigation.com into your browser yourself and compare what the email says with what the official site says.
- Keep your claim confirmation and the notice emails you received. If the administrator needs any identifier from you for payment, the official site will say so.
- No legitimate settlement administrator charges a fee to release a payment, and none will ask for a Social Security number, a bank login, or an up-front payment. A message that asks for any of those is not from the administrator, however official it looks.
The final approval order reports that A.B. Data received more than 40,000 late claims and notes that the Settlement Agreement gives the administrator discretion to accept late claims. Acceptance is up to the administrator and is not guaranteed. The opt-out and objection windows closed on August 27, 2026. A class member with no accepted claim who did not opt out stays in the Settlement Classes and gives up the released claims against Google without receiving a payment.
The settlement has two classes, both covering May 18, 2016 through March 19, 2026:
- Purchaser Settlement Class: U.S. buyers of a Google-Made Device: Pixel phones, Google Home, Home Mini, Home Max, Nest Hub and Nest Hub Max. A Samsung or other third-party Android phone was not a Google-Made Device.
- Privacy Settlement Class: Google Assistant users, or members of a user's household, whose communications were recorded by a False Accept or disclosed to a third-party review vendor, on any Assistant-enabled device.
Claims could be made under one class or both. Privacy Class claims needed no receipt, while Purchaser Class device claims required the device model, serial or IMEI number, and proof of purchase.
The $68 million fund is non-reversionary, and it is divided among valid claims using points after court-approved attorneys' fees, expenses, service awards and administration costs are deducted:
- Purchaser Class: 4 points per eligible Google-Made Device, capped at 3 devices (12 points)
- Privacy Class: 1 point
Current estimate: A.B. Data preliminarily estimates about $8 to $20 per point, which works out to about $32 to $80 per device and $8 to $20 for a privacy-only claim. The final approval order repeats an earlier estimate, made before claims were counted, of about $18 to $56 per Purchaser Class member and $2 to $10 per Privacy Class member. The Court approved fees of one-third of the fund, $1,021,738.40 in expenses and $5,000 service awards; the final figures depend on how many claims survive validation.
- March 19, 2026: settlement preliminarily approved
- July 23, 2026: Class Counsel filed its motion for attorneys' fees, expenses and service awards
- August 27, 2026: claim, opt-out and objection deadline (passed)
- September 17, 2026: Class Counsel filed their reply in support of final approval with the administrator's preliminary estimate of $8 to $20 per point
- October 1, 2026: Final Approval Hearing held before Judge Beth Labson Freeman, San Jose Courthouse
- October 13, 2026: final approval granted; fees, expenses and reduced service awards awarded; all seven objections overruled (ECF No. 584)
- Judgment: not yet entered as of October 13, 2026
- Payment date: not announced
The case is one of several recent lawsuits over voice assistants and passive audio collection, alongside claims about how recordings are reviewed and used to improve speech recognition. Google denies wrongdoing, and the settlement is not a finding that it broke the law, but the case reflects growing scrutiny of how smart devices handle what they hear.
• $95M Apple Siri Privacy Settlement: Lopez v. Apple Inc., which paid out in January 2026.
• What Happened With the Apple Siri Payments: how the Siri distribution played out, including the average payment per device.
• Amazon Alexa Voice ID BIPA Class Action: an Illinois biometric-privacy case over Alexa voiceprints.
Was the Google Assistant settlement approved?
Yes. Judge Beth Labson Freeman granted final approval on October 13, 2026 in a written order (ECF No. 584), after a hearing on October 1. The order awarded Class Counsel $22,666,666.70 in fees (one-third of the fund) and $1,021,738.40 in expenses, cut the class representatives' service awards from $10,000 to $5,000 each, and overruled all seven objections. Judgment had not yet been entered as of October 13, 2026.
Can I still file a Google Assistant settlement claim?
No. The claim deadline was August 27, 2026. The Court's October 13, 2026 final approval order reports more than 40,000 late claims and notes that the Settlement Agreement gives the Settlement Administrator discretion to accept late claims, so acceptance of any late claim is up to the administrator and is not guaranteed. The opt-out and objection deadlines also closed on August 27. Class members with no accepted claim who did not opt out remain in the Settlement Classes and are bound by the release without receiving a payment.
When will Google Assistant settlement payments be sent?
No payment date had been announced as of October 13, 2026. The Court granted final approval that day and directed Class Counsel to submit a proposed judgment. Payments follow entry of judgment and the end of any appeal; in federal civil cases a notice of appeal is generally due within 30 days after judgment is entered. The official settlement website will post the payment timeline once one exists.
How much will Google Assistant claimants receive?
Final amounts are not set. The latest per-point figure in the court record is the Settlement Administrator's September 17, 2026 preliminary estimate of about $8 to $20 per point. Payments are pro rata under a point system: 4 points per eligible Google-Made Device (up to 3 devices) and 1 point for the Privacy Settlement Class. That works out to about $32 to $80 per device, $8 to $20 for a privacy-only claim, and $104 to $260 for the maximum 13-point claim. The fee and expense awards in the October 13 order were no larger than requested; the estimate may still change after claim validation.
How many claims were filed in the Google Assistant settlement?
More than 1.5 million, according to the Settlement Administrator: more than 1.49 million timely claims and more than 40,000 late claims, which the administrator has discretion to accept. The preliminary count in its supplemental declaration is 1,536,964 claimants, with Purchaser Class claims listing 1.35 devices on average.
Is an email about my Google Assistant settlement payment real?
Do not judge it by the email alone. The court-appointed Settlement Administrator, A.B. Data, Ltd., has contacted class members by email, and bulk settlement emails often land in spam and look like phishing, while fake ones can look official. Instead of clicking links in a message, type GoogleAssistantPrivacyLitigation.com into your browser and check what the official site says. No legitimate administrator charges a fee to release a settlement payment or asks for a Social Security number, a bank login, or an up-front payment.
How do I check on a Google Assistant claim I already filed?
Keep the confirmation the online claim form displayed or emailed you when you submitted it, along with any notice emails you received. If you have a question about your claim, use the contact page on the official settlement website, GoogleAssistantPrivacyLitigation.com. Claims are reviewed by the Settlement Administrator, which may contact claimants if it needs more information.
• Official Settlement Website: GoogleAssistantPrivacyLitigation.com
• In re Google Assistant Privacy Litigation, Case No. 5:19-cv-04286-BLF, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Hon. Beth Labson Freeman presiding
• Order Granting Final Approval of Class Action Settlement, Granting in Part and Denying in Part Fees Motion, and Overruling Objections (ECF No. 584), signed October 13, 2026: CourtListener
• Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Final Approval and Fee Request (ECF No. 574) and Supplemental Declaration of the Settlement Administrator (ECF No. 574-1), filed September 17, 2026; class member objection (ECF No. 571), filed September 10, 2026
• Long Form Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement and reminder email notice from the Settlement Administrator, A.B. Data, Ltd.
• TechRepublic: Google's $68 Million Settlement: Who Qualifies and How to File a Claim
• Yahoo Finance: Google $68 Million Privacy Settlement Payments coverage
About This Article
Settlement status is current as of October 13, 2026 and will change once judgment is entered and payments are scheduled. Always check the
official settlement website
for the latest. OpenClassActions.com is a consumer advocacy and class action news site, and is not a class action administrator or a law firm.
For more class actions keep scrolling below.
Status
Final Approval Granted — Payments Pending
Settlement Fund
$68,000,000
Estimated Payout
$8–$20 per point (preliminary administrator estimate)
Case Title
In re Google Assistant Privacy Litigation
Case Number
5:19-cv-04286-BLF
Court
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
Claim Deadline
August 27, 2026 (passed)
Final Approval
Granted October 13, 2026 (ECF No. 584)
Fees Awarded
$22,666,666.70 (one-third) + $1,021,738.40 expenses
Administrator
A.B. Data, Ltd.