Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Update 2026 — Settlement Amount, How to Join, and Do You Qualify?

By Steve Levine

Bard PowerPort Lawsuit 2026 Implanted Port Catheter Fracture Migration Chronoflex Injury Claim MDL 3081

Published: April 22, 2026

Status Accepting Cases Federal MDL pretrial proceedings underway

Device Bard PowerPort family C.R. Bard / Becton Dickinson implantable venous-access ports

Court MDL 3081 · D. Arizona Before Judge David G. Campbell

Proof Required Yes Medical records, implant/explant reports, imaging

See If You Qualify — Free Case Evaluation

What Is the Bard PowerPort Lawsuit About?

The Bard PowerPort is a family of implantable venous-access devices manufactured by C.R. Bard, Inc. and its parent company Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD). An implanted port, sometimes called a “port-a-cath,” is a small reservoir placed surgically under the skin of the chest and connected to a catheter that is threaded into a central vein near the heart. Ports provide long-term intravenous access and are used primarily for chemotherapy, long-course antibiotics, nutritional support, and other treatments that require repeated infusions.

The central allegation in the Bard PowerPort lawsuits is that the catheter portion of the device — made from a barium-sulfate-impregnated polyurethane called Chronoflex — degrades, fractures, and migrates inside the body at rates higher than a reasonably safe medical device should. Plaintiffs allege that the Chronoflex material develops micro-cracks and surface defects under the mechanical stress of implantation and normal physiologic use, and that fragments of the catheter can break off and travel through the bloodstream to the heart, lungs, or other organs. Plaintiffs further allege that Bard knew or should have known about these risks and failed to adequately warn physicians and patients.

The personal-injury lawsuits have been consolidated for pretrial purposes in a federal multidistrict litigation (MDL 3081), In re: Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation, pending in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona before Judge David G. Campbell. The MDL was created by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation in August 2023 and continues to accept new cases as they are filed and transferred.

Which Bard PowerPort Devices Are Involved?

The investigation covers the full PowerPort implantable-port product family. Commonly named models include:

• Bard PowerPort (original)
• Bard PowerPort ClearVUE
• Bard PowerPort MRI
• Bard PowerPort ClearVUE MRI
• Bard PowerPort Duo MRI
• Bard PowerPort isp MRI

If you are not sure which Bard port you received, your surgical operative report, the sticker card given to you at the time of implant, or your hospital’s medical-device records will identify the exact model and lot number.

What Injuries Are Alleged?

The following complications have been reported by Bard PowerPort patients and are the injuries most commonly pleaded in MDL 3081:

• Catheter fracture — the Chronoflex catheter breaking into one or more pieces inside the body.
• Catheter migration — fragments of the catheter or the entire catheter traveling away from the implanted position, often into the right atrium, right ventricle, or pulmonary arteries.
• Cardiac arrhythmia and cardiac perforation caused by fragments lodging in or puncturing heart tissue.
• Pulmonary embolism caused by catheter fragments traveling to the lungs.
• Deep-vein thrombosis and blood clots related to the damaged device.
• Severe infection, including bacteremia and sepsis, associated with device failure.
• Surgical revision or open-chest removal required to retrieve migrated catheter fragments.
• Wrongful death — families who lost a loved one following a Bard PowerPort complication may qualify to file a claim on the decedent’s behalf.

Do I Qualify for the Bard PowerPort Lawsuit?

You may qualify for the Bard PowerPort lawsuit (and a free case review) if you or a loved one was implanted with a Bard PowerPort family device — sometimes called a Bard port-a-cath — and later experienced a catheter-related complication that required medical attention. The strongest claims typically involve:

• Device identification — operative report, implant sticker, or medical-device record confirming the specific Bard PowerPort model and lot.
• Imaging or explant records — chest X-ray, CT, echocardiogram, or interventional-radiology report documenting fracture or migration; operative report from the revision/explant procedure.
• Diagnosis of an alleged injury — hospital records for infection, clot, embolism, arrhythmia, or cardiac event linked to the device.
• Timeline — approximate dates of original implantation, the complication, and any subsequent removal or revision procedures.

Not every patient who had a PowerPort will qualify — the investigation focuses on patients with a documented device failure and a related injury. An intake attorney can tell you quickly whether your facts fit the criteria.

Start Your Free Case Review

Status of MDL 3081

MDL 3081, In re: Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation, is the federal multidistrict litigation that consolidates Bard PowerPort personal-injury cases for coordinated pretrial proceedings. It is pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, in Phoenix, before Judge David G. Campbell. The MDL handles discovery, expert challenges, and bellwether trial selection centrally; individual plaintiff cases are then either tried as bellwethers, resolved through a global settlement, or remanded to their home federal districts for trial. The MDL continues to accept new cases as they are filed in or transferred to the District of Arizona.

How Much Is the Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Settlement Worth Per Person?

There is no fixed Bard PowerPort settlement amount at this stage — claims are evaluated individually and the litigation has not yet produced a global settlement. If a claim succeeds, compensation may include medical bills (past and future), lost wages, pain and suffering, loss of consortium, and, in wrongful-death claims, funeral expenses and loss of financial support. Punitive damages may also be available where a manufacturer’s conduct is found to be especially egregious. Individual claim values per person depend on the severity of the injury, the strength of device and medical documentation, and whether the case resolves through a bellwether trial, a global settlement, or an individual trial.

How to Join the Bard PowerPort Lawsuit (MDL 3081)

1. Pre-qualify online. Take a short, free intake questionnaire to see if your facts match the MDL 3081 criteria.
Pre-qualify for a free Bard PowerPort evaluation.

2. Free consultation with an attorney. If you pre-qualify, you’ll be matched with an attorney who handles medical-device injury cases and is familiar with MDL 3081.

3. Preserve evidence. Request a complete copy of your medical records, including the operative report from the original implant, any explant procedure, and all imaging. If you still have the device sticker card, keep it.

4. Case filing. If your claim proceeds, your attorney will file your case directly into MDL 3081 or file in a federal district court where the case will be transferred to the MDL. Individual plaintiffs retain their own attorneys even when cases are consolidated.

Submit Your Bard PowerPort Claim

Filing Mass Tort and Injury Claims

Please note that any claim form will be rejected if you submit information that is false or fraudulent. By providing information, you agree that it is truthful to the best of your knowledge. If you are not sure whether you qualify, speak with an attorney before filing. OpenClassActions.com is a consumer advocacy and class-action news site, and is not a law firm, a medical provider, or a class-action administrator.