Published
April 22, 2026
Updated
June 19, 2026
If a Bard PowerPort implanted port fractured, migrated, or required surgical removal, you may qualify to file an injury claim in MDL 3081.
Allegations Only · No Liability Finding Yet
This article describes claims in active litigation. The statements below are unproven allegations. C.R. Bard and Becton, Dickinson and Company have not been found liable, and the MDL has not produced a global settlement. This page is informational and is not legal or medical advice.
Status
Now Accepting Cases
Federal MDL pretrial proceedings underway · time is limited to file
Device
Bard PowerPort family
C.R. Bard / Becton Dickinson implantable venous-access ports
Court
MDL 3081 · D. Arizona
Before Judge David G. Campbell
Cost to You
$0
Free case evaluation · contingency representation, no fee unless you recover
What Is the Bard PowerPort Lawsuit About?
The Bard PowerPort is a family of implantable venous-access devices manufactured by C.R. Bard, Inc. and its parent company Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD). An implanted port, sometimes called a “port-a-cath,” is a small reservoir placed surgically under the skin of the chest and connected to a catheter that is threaded into a central vein near the heart. Ports provide long-term intravenous access and are used primarily for chemotherapy, long-course antibiotics, nutritional support, and other treatments that require repeated infusions.The central allegation in the Bard PowerPort lawsuits is that the catheter portion of the device — made from a barium-sulfate-impregnated polyurethane called Chronoflex — degrades, fractures, and migrates inside the body at rates higher than a reasonably safe medical device should. Plaintiffs allege that the Chronoflex material develops micro-cracks and surface defects under the mechanical stress of implantation and normal physiologic use, and that fragments of the catheter can break off and travel through the bloodstream to the heart, lungs, or other organs. Plaintiffs further allege that Bard knew or should have known about these risks and failed to adequately warn physicians and patients.
The personal-injury lawsuits have been consolidated for pretrial purposes in a federal multidistrict litigation (MDL 3081), In re: Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation, pending in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona before Judge David G. Campbell. The MDL was created by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation in August 2023 and continues to accept new cases as they are filed and transferred.
Which Bard PowerPort Devices Are Involved?
The litigation covers the full PowerPort implantable-port product family. Commonly named models include:• Bard PowerPort (original)
• Bard PowerPort ClearVUE
• Bard PowerPort MRI
• Bard PowerPort ClearVUE MRI
• Bard PowerPort Duo MRI
• Bard PowerPort isp MRI
If you are not sure which Bard port you received, your surgical operative report, the sticker card given to you at the time of implant, or your hospital’s medical-device records will identify the exact model and lot number.
What Injuries Are Alleged?
The following complications have been reported by Bard PowerPort patients and are the injuries most commonly pleaded in MDL 3081:• Catheter fracture — the Chronoflex catheter breaking into one or more pieces inside the body.
• Catheter migration — fragments of the catheter or the entire catheter traveling away from the implanted position, often into the right atrium, right ventricle, or pulmonary arteries.
• Cardiac arrhythmia and cardiac perforation caused by fragments lodging in or puncturing heart tissue.
• Pulmonary embolism caused by catheter fragments traveling to the lungs.
• Deep-vein thrombosis and blood clots related to the damaged device.
• Severe infection, including bacteremia and sepsis, associated with device failure.
• Surgical revision or open-chest removal required to retrieve migrated catheter fragments.
• Wrongful death — families who lost a loved one following a Bard PowerPort complication may qualify to file a claim on the decedent’s behalf.
Do I Qualify for the Bard PowerPort Lawsuit?
You may qualify for the Bard PowerPort lawsuit (and a free case review) if you or a loved one was implanted with a Bard PowerPort family device — sometimes called a Bard port-a-cath — and later experienced a catheter-related complication that required medical attention. The strongest claims typically involve:• Device identification — operative report, implant sticker, or medical-device record confirming the specific Bard PowerPort model and lot.
• Imaging or explant records — chest X-ray, CT, echocardiogram, or interventional-radiology report documenting fracture or migration; operative report from the revision/explant procedure.
• Diagnosis of an alleged injury — hospital records for infection, clot, embolism, arrhythmia, or cardiac event linked to the device.
• Timeline — approximate dates of original implantation, the complication, and any subsequent removal or revision procedures.
Not every patient who had a PowerPort will qualify — the litigation focuses on patients with a documented device failure and a related injury. An intake attorney can tell you quickly whether your facts fit the criteria.
Bard PowerPort Litigation Timeline
How the Bard PowerPort litigation has progressed, with the key procedural milestones intake firms use to evaluate claims today.-
Aug 2023MDL 3081 created. The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidates Bard PowerPort cases as In re: Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona before Judge David G. Campbell.
-
2024Coordinated discovery underway. The MDL moves through centralized fact discovery, expert work, and document production on the alleged Chronoflex catheter defects.
-
2025Bellwether process develops. The court and parties work toward selecting representative cases for early bellwether trials that help gauge how juries may value the claims.
-
2026MDL continues to grow. New cases are still being filed in or transferred to the District of Arizona as additional patients identify catheter-failure injuries.
Status of MDL 3081
MDL 3081, In re: Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation, is the federal multidistrict litigation that consolidates Bard PowerPort personal-injury cases for coordinated pretrial proceedings. It is pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, in Phoenix, before Judge David G. Campbell. The MDL handles discovery, expert challenges, and bellwether trial selection centrally; individual plaintiff cases are then either tried as bellwethers, resolved through a global settlement, or remanded to their home federal districts for trial. The MDL continues to accept new cases as they are filed in or transferred to the District of Arizona.How Much Is the Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Worth Per Person?
There is no fixed Bard PowerPort settlement amount at this stage — claims are evaluated individually and the litigation has not yet produced a global settlement. If a claim succeeds, compensation may include medical bills (past and future), lost wages, pain and suffering, loss of consortium, and, in wrongful-death claims, funeral expenses and loss of financial support. Punitive damages may also be available where a manufacturer’s conduct is found to be especially egregious. Individual claim values per person depend on the severity of the injury, the strength of device and medical documentation, and whether the case resolves through a bellwether trial, a global settlement, or an individual trial.How to Join the Bard PowerPort Lawsuit (MDL 3081)
1. Pre-qualify online. Take a short, free intake questionnaire to see if your facts match the MDL 3081 criteria.Pre-qualify for a free Bard PowerPort evaluation.
2. Free consultation with an attorney. If you pre-qualify, you’ll be matched with an attorney who handles medical-device injury cases and is familiar with MDL 3081.
3. Preserve evidence. Request a complete copy of your medical records, including the operative report from the original implant, any explant procedure, and all imaging. If you still have the device sticker card, keep it.
4. Case filing. If your claim proceeds, your attorney will file your case directly into MDL 3081 or file in a federal district court where the case will be transferred to the MDL. Individual plaintiffs retain their own attorneys even when cases are consolidated.
Is There a Deadline to File?
Yes. Statutes of limitations apply and vary by state. Time is limited to file a claim, and some states have shorter filing windows than others. Once the deadline passes, you may lose your right to seek compensation permanently. If you believe a Bard PowerPort device caused an injury, complete the free evaluation as soon as possible to determine whether your case is still within the filing window.Free Case Review: See If You Qualify
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I qualify for the Bard PowerPort lawsuit?
You may qualify if you or a loved one was implanted with a Bard PowerPort family device and later experienced a catheter-related complication — such as fracture, migration, infection, blood clots, or a cardiac or pulmonary injury — that required medical attention. The strongest claims have medical records documenting the device and the resulting injury. A free case review can confirm whether your facts fit the MDL 3081 criteria.
How much is the Bard PowerPort lawsuit settlement worth per person?
There is no fixed Bard PowerPort settlement amount at this stage — the litigation has not yet produced a global settlement, and claims are evaluated individually. Potential compensation depends on the severity of the injury, the strength of the device and medical documentation, and whether the case resolves through a bellwether trial, a global settlement, or an individual trial.
Which Bard PowerPort devices are involved?
The litigation covers the full PowerPort implantable-port family, including the original Bard PowerPort, ClearVUE, MRI, ClearVUE MRI, Duo MRI, and isp MRI models. Your surgical operative report, the implant sticker card, or your hospital's medical-device records will identify the exact model and lot number.
What is MDL 3081?
MDL 3081, In re: Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation, is the federal multidistrict litigation that consolidates Bard PowerPort personal-injury cases for coordinated pretrial proceedings. It is pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona before Judge David G. Campbell and continues to accept new cases.
Is there a deadline to file a Bard PowerPort claim?
Yes. Statutes of limitations apply and vary by state. Time is limited to file a claim, so you should complete a free case evaluation as soon as possible to determine whether your case is still within the filing window.
Free settlement alerts
Get notified when new class actions open to claims
Join thousands of readers who get the latest class action settlements you may qualify for — delivered straight to your inbox.
Filing Mass Tort and Injury Claims
Please note that any claim form will be rejected if you submit information that is false or fraudulent. By providing information, you agree that it is truthful to the best of your knowledge. If you are not sure whether you qualify, speak with an attorney before filing. OpenClassActions.com is a consumer advocacy and class-action news site, and is not a law firm, a medical provider, or a class-action administrator.ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT. DOES NOT CONSTITUTE MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.
Information on OpenClassActions.com is for general informational and advertising purposes. No attorney-client relationship between reader and any partners or law firms is created by submitting any forms. Upon submitting any forms on this or partner sites, you agree that a legal representative or a partner firm may contact you.
For more open class actions keep scrolling below.
Status
Active Litigation — Now Accepting Cases
Case Title
In re: Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation
MDL Number
MDL No. 3081
Court
U.S. District Court, District of Arizona
Judge
Hon. David G. Campbell
Date Consolidated
August 2023
