xAI Data Center Turbine Noise Class Action (Miss.)
Environmental Class Action · Lawsuit Filed
xAI, SpaceX & MZX Tech Face Class Action Over Constant Data Center Turbine Noise in Southaven, Mississippi
PublishedJuly 2, 2026
More than 10,000 residents of Southaven and Horn Lake could be covered by the proposed class, which seeks damages and a court order to abate the noise.
A proposed class action targets the gas-fired turbines powering xAI's data centers near Southaven, Mississippi.
This article describes a class action complaint. The statements below are unproven
allegations. X.AI Corp., Space Exploration Technologies Corp. and MZX Tech LLC have not
been found liable, there is no certified class, and there is nothing to claim at this
time. This page is informational and is not legal advice.
What Is This About?
Three residents of Southaven, Mississippi have filed a proposed class action accusing xAI, SpaceX
and MZX Tech LLC of blanketing their suburban neighborhoods with round-the-clock industrial noise
from the gas-fired turbines that power xAI's artificial intelligence data centers. The complaint,
Haley v. X.AI Corp., was filed June 8, 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of Mississippi (Case No. 3:26-cv-00148), and centers on the power plant the defendants
operate at 2875 Stanton Road South in Southaven — referred to in the complaint as the
"Southaven Plant."
According to the complaint, the defendants began running "temporary" gas turbines at the site in
mid-2025 to power xAI's Memphis-area data centers — including the Colossus facilities where the
company trains and runs its Grok AI models — and have since grown the installation from 3 turbines
to 57. The plaintiffs allege the turbines emit a continuous mix of high-pitched squealing, engine
roar, low-frequency rumbling and tonal humming that travels into homes in Southaven and neighboring
Horn Lake 24 hours a day, disrupting sleep and making it impossible to enjoy their homes and yards.
The defendants have not responded to the allegations in court, and none of the claims have been proven.
StatusComplaint Filed · June 8, 2026
ClaimsPrivate & Public Nuisance, Negligence, Negligence Per Se, NIEDProposed class of 10,000+ residents and property owners near the Southaven Plant
Can I Claim?No — nothing to claim yetNo class certified and no settlement; complaint stage only
What the Complaint Alleges
The complaint alleges that in less than a year the defendants increased the number of gas-fired
turbines at the Southaven Plant by 1,800% — from 3 to 18 to 27 to 57 — while continuing to describe
them as "temporary." In March 2026, the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality approved a
permit for 41 additional "permanent" turbines at the site, a decision that is now being challenged
in a separate appeal by environmental groups.
Residents allege the resulting noise is "omnipresent and inescapable," penetrating the walls of
their homes even with windows closed, and that it can be felt as physical vibration. The complaint
describes decibel readings as high as 70 dBA at residents' property lines — the limit set by
Southaven's noise ordinance for normal industrial operations — and says the low-frequency component
of the noise is not fully captured by standard A-weighted measurements. Plaintiffs claim the
constant noise has caused sleep disruption, stress, anxiety, headaches, nausea and tinnitus, and
has diminished the value of homes near the plant. The complaint expressly does not assert personal
injury claims; it describes these as nuisance-level harms.
The plaintiffs also allege the defendants knew the risk before they arrived: noise complaints have
followed data centers and their power infrastructure around the country, and xAI's turbines at its
Memphis Colossus site had already drawn community opposition and a notice of intent to sue from the
NAACP over Clean Air Act issues before the Southaven site was purchased. Despite months of resident
complaints, petitions, a packed public hearing where no one spoke in favor of the permit, and the
Southaven mayor's own acknowledgment that "the noise has not been acceptable," the plaintiffs say
the defendants have not meaningfully reduced it.
Who Are the Defendants?
The complaint names three defendants. X.AI Corp. is the artificial intelligence company behind the
Grok large language model. MZX Tech LLC is the entity that purchased the Southaven property in July
2025 and holds the site's air permit; the complaint alleges MZX was formed at xAI's direction, is
managed by xAI, and shares its office address and personnel. SpaceX is named as xAI's alleged
successor in interest: the complaint alleges SpaceX acquired xAI in February 2026, that Elon Musk —
CEO of both companies — announced in May 2026 that xAI would be dissolved into "SpaceXAI," and that
SpaceX now owns or controls the Southaven Plant. Those successor-liability allegations, like the
rest of the complaint, are unproven.
Who Would Be in the Proposed Class?
The complaint proposes a class of all individuals who resided in or owned residential property, at
any time from August 2025 to the present, within a mapped area of Southaven and Horn Lake bounded
by Stateline Road West to the north, U.S. Highway 51 to the east, Nail Road to the south, and a
line one mile west of Horn Lake Road to the west. The plaintiffs allege more than 10,000 class
members reside within that area. The precise class definition would be set by the court if and when
it certifies the case. No class has been certified yet, so there is nothing for residents to file
at this stage.
What the Lawsuit Seeks
The proposed class action seeks compensatory damages for interference with the use and enjoyment of
property, mental anguish and emotional distress, nuisance-level physical harms, and — for property
owners — diminution in property value, along with punitive damages. The plaintiffs also ask the
court for injunctive relief to abate the noise from the Southaven Plant "in a manner to be
determined by experts." Whether any damages are awarded or operational changes are ordered would be
decided by the court as the litigation proceeds.
Read the Complaint
The full 62-page class action complaint filed in the Northern District of Mississippi is embedded
below.
What Happens Next?
As a newly filed complaint, the case is at an early stage. The defendants will have an opportunity
to respond, and the court will eventually decide whether to certify a class. Separately, the MDEQ
air permit for the 41 permanent turbines faces its own appeal, and xAI's Memphis-area operations
remain the subject of other environmental disputes. There is no settlement, no certified class, and
no claim form — so there is nothing for residents to submit right now. We will update this page if
the case is certified, dismissed, or resolved.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does the xAI Southaven class action allege?
The complaint alleges that xAI, SpaceX and MZX Tech LLC operate dozens of gas-fired turbines
at 2875 Stanton Road in Southaven, Mississippi to power xAI's nearby data centers, and that the
turbines emit constant noise and low-frequency vibration into surrounding neighborhoods 24
hours a day. The plaintiffs bring claims of private nuisance, public nuisance, negligence,
negligence per se under Southaven's noise ordinance, and negligent infliction of emotional
distress. These are unproven allegations; the defendants have not been found liable.
Is there a settlement or money to claim?
No. This is a recently filed complaint. No class has been certified, there is no settlement,
and there is nothing to claim at this time. The case must clear class certification before it
could proceed on behalf of the proposed class.
Who would be in the proposed class?
The complaint proposes a class of all individuals who resided in or owned residential
property, at any time from August 2025 to the present, within a defined area of Southaven and
Horn Lake, Mississippi — bounded by Stateline Road West to the north, U.S. Highway 51 to the
east, Nail Road to the south, and a line one mile west of Horn Lake Road to the west. The
plaintiffs allege more than 10,000 people live within that area. The exact class definition
would be decided by the court at certification.
What does the lawsuit ask for?
The complaint seeks monetary damages for loss of use and enjoyment of property, emotional
distress, nuisance-level physical harms, and diminished property values, plus punitive damages
and an injunction to abate the noise from the Southaven Plant. Whether any relief is awarded
would be decided by the court.
Why is SpaceX a defendant in an xAI lawsuit?
The complaint alleges that SpaceX acquired xAI in February 2026 and is xAI's successor in
interest, succeeding to its assets, operations and liabilities, and that SpaceX now owns or
controls the Southaven Plant. Those successor-liability allegations are unproven.