OpenAI & ChatGPT Lawsuits and Class Actions (2026)
Artificial Intelligence · Litigation Tracker

OpenAI and ChatGPT Lawsuits and Class Actions: A 2026 Tracker of Copyright, Privacy, and Injury Cases

Published July 1, 2026

OpenAI and ChatGPT are named in litigation spanning copyright, consumer privacy, and product-liability claims. This page tracks the major cases, what each one alleges, and where it stands.

The New York Times building in Manhattan
The Times' copyright suit against OpenAI and Microsoft is one of several lawsuits and class actions this page tracks.
Allegations Only · No Class Certified in Any Case Below

This article describes several pending lawsuits and complaints against OpenAI, Microsoft, and Sam Altman. The statements below are unproven allegations from court filings. None of the defendants has been found liable in any of these cases, no class has been certified, and there is nothing to claim in any of them. This page is informational and is not legal advice.

What Is This About?

OpenAI and its ChatGPT product are named as a defendant in several unrelated pieces of litigation moving through U.S. and Canadian courts in 2026 — copyright suits from a major newspaper and a group of authors, a consumer privacy class action over ChatGPT's tracking code, and an individual injury lawsuit tied to last year's Florida State University shooting.

This page tracks the major OpenAI and ChatGPT cases making news: what each one alleges, who brought it, and where it currently stands.

Status Multiple Cases Pending Last checked July 2, 2026
Cases Tracked 5 lawsuits and class actions Copyright, privacy, and injury litigation across U.S. and Canadian courts
Can I Claim Anything? No — nothing to claim yet None of the cases below has reached a settlement

The New York Times' Copyright Lawsuit Against OpenAI and Microsoft

The New York Times Company sued OpenAI and Microsoft in December 2023, alleging the companies used millions of the paper's articles without permission to train ChatGPT and other AI systems, and that Microsoft's computing infrastructure helped make that training possible. The Times also alleges Microsoft engaged in "contributory" infringement for supplying the computing power OpenAI used to build its models. The Times brings the case on its own behalf as the sole plaintiff, seeking to recover for its own copyrighted work, rather than as a proposed class action.

The Times amended the case on June 25, 2026, sharpening its claim that Microsoft actively encouraged OpenAI's alleged copying and dropping an earlier claim that OpenAI failed to stop users from generating copyrighted material with ChatGPT. A Times spokesperson said the changes streamline "the case to its most potent arguments" while its "core claims remain the same." OpenAI has said its models are "grounded in fair use," and Microsoft has called the claims unsubstantiated after a yearlong discovery process. The case is coordinated for pretrial proceedings with the consolidated author copyright cases described below, before U.S. District Judge Sidney H. Stein in the Southern District of New York.

The Consolidated Author Copyright Class Actions

A separate group of cases — captioned Tremblay v. OpenAI, Silverman v. OpenAI, and Chabon v. OpenAI, together with a related Authors Guild suit — allege OpenAI copied and used copyrighted books to train its models without permission or payment. Unlike The Times' suit, these are proposed class actions brought on behalf of authors whose books were allegedly used, not yet certified or settled. They are now coordinated as In re: OpenAI, Inc., Copyright Infringement Litigation before Judge Stein in the Southern District of New York. In October 2025, Judge Stein denied OpenAI's motion to dismiss the consolidated plaintiffs' core infringement claim, allowing the litigation to continue.

That theory is not hypothetical. In September 2025, OpenAI's rival Anthropic agreed to pay $1.5 billion to settle a nearly identical author copyright class action, after a judge found it had illegally downloaded and stored millions of copyrighted books — without admitting wrongdoing. Readers can see how that settlement played out on OCA's Anthropic $1.5 billion copyright settlement page. OpenAI has not reached any comparable settlement.

A Copyright Class Action Against OpenAI in Canada

A proposed class action was also filed against OpenAI in British Columbia, Canada, on behalf of Canadian authors, employers of authors, and their assignees or licensees whose copyrighted works were allegedly used in OpenAI's training data without consent. Filed by the law firm Siskinds in September 2024, the case is in its early stages, and OpenAI has moved to have it struck or dismissed for lack of jurisdiction in Canada. It has no bearing on U.S. residents.

The ChatGPT Privacy Class Action Over Meta and Google Tracking

Lim v. OpenAI Global, LLC, filed in the Northern District of California on May 5, 2026, was a proposed class action alleging OpenAI embedded Meta Pixel and Google Analytics tracking code into ChatGPT.com, allowing Meta and Google to receive users' query content along with identifying cookies without consent. The proposed class covered anyone who entered a query into ChatGPT while the alleged tracking code was active.

The case did not last long: the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed it without prejudice on May 13, 2026, just eight days after filing, and the court terminated the case on May 15, 2026. A voluntary dismissal without prejudice ends the case for now but does not decide the allegations on their merits and does not, by itself, prevent the same claims from being refiled later. See OCA's full write-up of the Lim v. OpenAI complaint for what it alleged in detail, including the complaint itself.

The underlying theory is still alive elsewhere. A closely comparable claim — that an AI chatbot's website secretly forwarded chat transcripts to Meta and Google — is currently being litigated against a different company in OCA's Perplexity AI chat privacy class action. Readers who want background on the wiretap statute both cases rely on can see OCA's CIPA glossary explainer.

The FSU Shooting Lawsuit Against Sam Altman and OpenAI

A lawsuit filed in Leon County, Florida circuit court alleges OpenAI rushed ChatGPT to market — one day ahead of a competing product from Google, according to the complaint — and that the rush affected the product's safety guardrails. The suit was brought by a survivor of the April 2025 shooting at Florida State University, who alleges she was shot and seriously injured by a gunman who had extensively used ChatGPT, including in the period leading up to the shooting. The plaintiff sued Sam Altman personally, in addition to OpenAI, alleging he directed decisions that affected the product's safety testing. Unlike the cases above, this is an individual product-liability and negligence lawsuit brought by one plaintiff on her own behalf, not a proposed class action.

The man charged in the shooting has pleaded not guilty and faces a pending criminal trial; nothing in this civil complaint has been proven, and OpenAI has said ChatGPT "is not responsible for this terrible crime" and that it proactively shared information about the account in question with law enforcement after the shooting.

What Happens Next

None of the cases above has reached a settlement, so there is no claim form to file and no deadline to track for consumers right now. The consolidated author copyright cases in the Southern District of New York are the ones most likely to eventually produce a class settlement, given that a nearly identical claim against Anthropic already has. If any OpenAI or ChatGPT case reaches a settlement or a certified class, OCA will publish a dedicated settlement page with the claim details.


For more class actions keep scrolling below.

Frequently Asked Questions

What lawsuits and class actions is OpenAI facing in 2026?

OpenAI and ChatGPT are named in several unrelated pieces of litigation: The New York Times' copyright suit against OpenAI and Microsoft, consolidated author copyright class actions coordinated in the Southern District of New York, a copyright class action filed in British Columbia, Canada, a ChatGPT privacy class action over Meta and Google tracking code, and an individual injury lawsuit tied to the 2025 Florida State University shooting.

What is the ChatGPT privacy class action about?

Lim v. OpenAI Global, LLC, filed in the Northern District of California in May 2026, alleged OpenAI embedded Meta Pixel and Google Analytics tracking code into ChatGPT.com, letting Meta and Google receive users' query content and identifying cookies without consent. The named plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the case eight days after filing.

Has a copyright class action against an AI company already settled?

Yes, but not against OpenAI. In September 2025, OpenAI's rival Anthropic agreed to pay $1.5 billion to settle a nearly identical author copyright class action, without admitting wrongdoing. OpenAI's own consolidated author copyright cases are still being litigated and have not settled.

Is The New York Times' lawsuit against OpenAI a class action?

No. The Times sues in its own right as a single corporate plaintiff seeking to recover for its own copyrighted articles, rather than on behalf of a class.

Can I file a claim in a class action against OpenAI right now?

No. None of the OpenAI-related cases tracked on this page has reached a settlement or produced a claim form. This page will be updated if any of them does.


Sources

• The New York Times — reporting on the June 25, 2026 amended complaint
The New York Times Company v. Microsoft Corporation, et al., No. 1:23-cv-11195 (S.D.N.Y.) — docket via CourtListener
In re: OpenAI, Inc., Copyright Infringement Litigation, No. 1:25-md-03143 (S.D.N.Y.) — docket via CourtListener
• BakerHostetler — OpenAI ChatGPT Litigation case tracker
• Siskinds LLP — OpenAI copyright class action (British Columbia)
Lim v. OpenAI Global, LLC, No. 3:26-cv-04063 (N.D. Cal.) — complaint and court docket; see OCA's full case write-up
• WCTV (Gray Media) — reporting on the FSU shooting lawsuit


About This Page

This article summarizes several pending, unrelated lawsuits involving OpenAI, Microsoft, and Sam Altman. The statements attributed to each complaint are allegations only; none of the defendants has been found liable in any case described here, no class has been certified in any of them, and there is no settlement or claim form for consumers in any of them. OpenClassActions.com is a consumer news and information site and is not a law firm or a party to any of these cases. This page is general information, not legal advice.

For more class actions keep scrolling below.
Status Amended Complaint Filed
Case Title The New York Times Company v. Microsoft Corporation, OpenAI, Inc., et al.
Case Number 1:23-cv-11195
Court U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
Date Filed December 27, 2023 Amended June 25, 2026

More on AI Litigation — related coverage