Published
June 26, 2026
Hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians built lives in the United States under temporary humanitarian programs they were told would shield them from a war zone. In 2026, the legal ground under those programs is shifting fast — and a series of changes has left many of them facing a quiet slide out of legal status, even as the war back home grinds on.
The Disconnect at the Heart of the Crisis
There is a jarring gap between geopolitical reality and U.S. immigration policy. The State Department still lists Ukraine as a "Level 4: Do Not Travel" country and condemns Russian strikes on civilian infrastructure. At the same time, the Department of Homeland Security has been winding down the temporary protections that let displaced Ukrainians stay. Immigration advocates, humanitarian organizations, and dissenting Supreme Court justices have described the result as an unprecedented situation.The core legal reason is structural. Programs like Temporary Protected Status (TPS) and humanitarian parole were never designed as permanent paths to citizenship. Under U.S. law they are temporary, discretionary shields that the executive branch can grant, decline to renew, or end. After a set of June 2026 Supreme Court rulings, the question of whether a country is "safe enough" to return people to has been treated largely as a political judgment for the President — not a legal one for the courts to second-guess.
Three June 2026 Supreme Court Rulings
Three decisions in June 2026 reshaped the landscape for noncitizens. We cover them in depth in our companion explainer on the June 2026 Supreme Court TPS and asylum rulings; in brief:• Mullin v. Doe (No. 25-1083, decided June 25, 2026) — A 6-3 majority held that the statute barring review of "any determination" about TPS strips federal courts of jurisdiction over non-constitutional challenges to TPS terminations. In practice, that removes a key judicial check on the executive branch's power to end TPS designations.
• Mullin v. Al Otro Lado (No. 25-5) — The Court held that a person standing on the Mexican side of the border line has not yet "arrived in" the United States for asylum purposes, validating "metering" practices that turn people away before they reach U.S. soil.
• Blanche v. Lau (No. 25-429) — The Court held that border officers do not need clear and convincing evidence of a disqualifying crime before treating a returning lawful permanent resident with a pending charge as an "applicant for admission," shifting the burden onto the returning resident.
Each decision drew a sharp dissent. Justice Sotomayor, dissenting in the asylum case, warned the approach lets the executive branch insulate itself from its asylum obligations. None of these rulings singled out Ukrainians — but together they removed guardrails that displaced Ukrainians had been relying on.
Why "Temporary" Means Temporary Under U.S. Law
From a strictly legal standpoint, DHS has long maintained that TPS and Uniting for Ukraine (U4U) were granted as short-term relief that can be revoked or allowed to expire when the executive branch decides. Ukraine was designated for TPS after the full-scale invasion in February 2022, and the designation was later extended for 18 months — running from April 20, 2025 through October 19, 2026.That timeline created an "eligibility gap." Because DHS has not moved the continuous-residence cutoff date forward, many Ukrainians who arrived in late 2023, 2024, or early 2025 cannot qualify for TPS at all. Roughly 103,700 Ukrainians did register and hold active TPS. Under Mullin v. Doe, if DHS lets the designation lapse on October 19, 2026 — or terminates it earlier — those TPS holders would have little practical recourse in federal court, regardless of conditions on the ground in Ukraine.
The Collapse of Uniting for Ukraine
For most Ukrainians who arrived after the opening months of the invasion, the main pathway was the Uniting for Ukraine humanitarian parole program. Launched in April 2022, U4U used private sponsorship to grant approved beneficiaries a temporary, two-year period of parole. Roughly 240,000 Ukrainians entered through the program, with tens of thousands more paroled at land ports of entry.That pathway was suspended in late January 2025, closing it to new sponsors. People already in the country kept their existing parole, but their two-year grants began running out, leaving many on a ticking clock. To stay lawfully present, U4U parolees must now navigate a case-by-case re-parole process that is no longer streamlined — applications are reviewed individually, on a discretionary basis, with extensive documentation of "urgent humanitarian reasons" or "significant public benefit." Administrative holds, policy shifts, and litigation have made the process slow and uncertain.
The cost has also climbed. Filing for re-parole and a renewed work permit can run well over $1,600 in combined fees, before factoring in long processing times that frequently cause status and work-authorization to lapse in the gap between filing and approval. For a displaced family that has been stripped of its income, that is a steep barrier.
The Polish Transit Route
One of the starkest features of this period has been the resumption of removals to Ukraine despite the active war. Because Ukrainian airspace is closed to civil aviation, deportation charters cannot fly directly into Kyiv. According to reporting and monitoring by human rights organizations, U.S. authorities have instead routed removals through Polish transit facilities such as Rzeszów-Jasionka Airport near the border, with people then moved across the land border into Ukraine.Human rights groups argue this conflicts with international non-refoulement principles and with guidance from the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees urging states not to forcibly return people to Ukraine. But domestic enforcement has proceeded on the view that U.S. statutory law governs these removals, and — after the June 2026 rulings — that federal courts have little room to intervene once a person's temporary status has lapsed.
Pressure on Every Side: Work, Driving, and Benefits
The squeeze is not limited to status. A March 2026 federal rule sharply restricted who may obtain a Non-Domiciled Commercial Driver's License, limiting eligibility to certain visa holders and no longer treating an Employment Authorization Document as sufficient — a change that hit Ukrainian truck drivers who had joined the commercial transport workforce. Separately, a sweeping 2025 budget law eliminated Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) eligibility for most immigrants who are not lawful permanent residents, refugees, asylees, or people granted withholding of removal — a category that excludes humanitarian parolees and TPS holders who had previously been eligible.Meanwhile, several alternative routes to a more durable status have narrowed: affirmative asylum decisions were placed on an extended administrative pause, an annual fee was attached to pending asylum applications, Diversity Visa processing was halted for prior lottery winners, and family-based petitions have faced more aggressive vetting. The cumulative effect is fewer off-ramps to permanent status at the same moment the temporary protections are winding down.
Why Deportations Continue Despite the War
The system justifies removals to a country at war through a few connected ideas. First, "temporary" is read literally: DHS's position is that TPS and parole can end whenever the executive branch deems it appropriate. Second, practical barriers like closed airspace are worked around through transit countries. And third — the decisive point after June 2026 — domestic immigration enforcement has been insulated from judicial review. Because the Supreme Court narrowed courts' power to review these executive actions, the danger a person would face on return generally carries no legal weight in a removal proceeding once their temporary status has expired.Unless Congress passes a specific statutory fix or DHS issues a new or extended designation, the reality of the war does not stop the clock on an administrative expiration date. That is the heart of what advocates are calling a de-documentation crisis: not necessarily a wave of formal deportation orders, but a steady lapse of status as deadlines pass, fees mount, and judicial off-ramps close.
What Comes Next
The single most consequential date on the horizon is October 19, 2026, when Ukraine's current TPS designation is set to expire. Whether DHS extends it, redesignates Ukraine to capture more recent arrivals, or lets it lapse will determine the status of roughly 103,700 people in one stroke. For the larger U4U population, the trajectory is more gradual — a case-by-case grind of re-parole filings, fees, and processing delays that can quietly tip families into unlawful status without any single dramatic moment.For readers tracking the underlying legal machinery, our explainer on the June 2026 Supreme Court immigration rulings breaks down each holding and dissent, and our report on the federal ruling against USCIS application-hold policies covers an earlier court check on processing freezes. Official status, deadlines, and designations are set by the government — USCIS.gov and the Federal Register are the authoritative places to confirm them.
Free settlement alerts
Get notified when new class actions open to claims
Join thousands of readers who get the latest class action settlements you may qualify for — delivered straight to your inbox.
Frequently Asked Questions
When does Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Ukraine expire?
The current Ukraine TPS designation runs through October 19, 2026. It was extended for 18 months in January 2025, covering April 20, 2025 through October 19, 2026. Whether it is extended again is a discretionary decision for the Secretary of Homeland Security. This page is general information, not legal advice, and the status may change; check USCIS.gov for the current designation.
Why are Ukrainians being deported when there is still a war?
Under U.S. law, programs like TPS and humanitarian parole are temporary and discretionary, not permanent paths to citizenship. After the June 2026 Supreme Court rulings, courts are largely blocked from reviewing whether the executive branch may end or decline to extend these protections. As a result, the fact that conditions in a home country remain dangerous does not automatically stop removal once a person's temporary status has lapsed, unless Congress acts or a new designation is granted.
What was Uniting for Ukraine (U4U) and is it still open?
Uniting for Ukraine was a humanitarian parole program launched in April 2022 that let approved sponsors bring Ukrainians to the United States for a temporary two-year parole period. The program was suspended in late January 2025, closing it to new applicants. People already paroled into the country kept their grants but must seek case-by-case re-parole to remain lawfully present as their initial two years expire.
Did the Supreme Court block judicial review of TPS terminations?
In Mullin v. Doe (June 25, 2026), a 6-3 majority held that 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b)(5)(A) strips federal courts of jurisdiction to hear non-constitutional challenges to TPS terminations, reading the bar on reviewing "any determination" very broadly. Two companion rulings, Mullin v. Al Otro Lado and Blanche v. Lau, further limited asylum access at the border and weakened protections for some returning lawful permanent residents.
Is this article legal advice?
No. OpenClassActions.com is a consumer news and information site, not a law firm. This page is general information about immigration policy and recent court rulings, not legal advice, and it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Anyone facing a change in immigration status should rely on official government sources and a qualified, accredited immigration professional for guidance about their own situation.
Sources
• Mullin v. Doe, No. 25-1083 (U.S. June 25, 2026); Mullin v. Al Otro Lado, No. 25-5 (U.S. 2026); Blanche v. Lau, No. 25-429 (U.S. June 23, 2026)• U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Temporary Protected Status — Ukraine designation and extension notices (Federal Register)
• U.S. Department of Homeland Security / USCIS, Uniting for Ukraine program announcements and re-parole guidance
• U.S. Department of State, Ukraine Travel Advisory (Level 4: Do Not Travel)
• U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), guidance on returns to Ukraine
About This Page
This article summarizes publicly reported developments in U.S. immigration policy and recent Supreme Court decisions affecting noncitizens, including Ukrainian TPS holders and humanitarian parolees. OpenClassActions.com is a consumer news and information site and is not a law firm, a government agency, or a party to any case. This page is general information, not legal advice, and the legal landscape described here may change. For the current status of any program, designation, or deadline, consult official U.S. government sources such as USCIS.gov and the Federal Register, and consult a qualified, accredited immigration professional about any individual situation.
For more class actions keep scrolling below.
