If PFAS forever chemicals may have reached your drinking water or the products you use, here is who attorneys are evaluating and how PFAS claims have been handled so far.
Investigation · Allegations Only
This article describes an ongoing investigation and PFAS-related litigation. The statements below are unproven allegations. This page is informational and is not legal or medical advice. Eligibility and any recovery would depend on the facts of an individual case.
What Is This About?
Attorneys are evaluating claims from individuals whose health may have been affected by products or water containing toxic "forever chemicals" called PFAS — per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances. PFAS (fluorinated surfactants) are one of the key components in Class B fluorinated foams used in fire suppression systems, and they appear in a wide range of industrial and consumer products.PFAS are chemicals used in industrial production and oil processing, and they have contaminated some drinking water supplies. PFAS can also be found in numerous everyday products such as nonstick cookware, clothing, cosmetics, and the foams firefighters use to put out fuel fires. Certain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances are understood to be dangerous to health, including perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS).
PFAS have been associated with cancer, suppressed immune function, interference with normal hormone and thyroid function, and reproductive harm. If your health may have been affected by PFAS exposure, you may have a claim.
Where PFAS Litigation Stands in 2026
Most PFAS litigation in the United States runs through one proceeding: multidistrict litigation No. 2873, In re: Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability Litigation, before Judge Richard M. Gergel in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina. It began with AFFF firefighting foam and has grown into the clearing house for federal PFAS claims, with roughly 15,200 actions pending as of mid-2026 — one of the largest MDLs in the country.That docket has two very different tracks, and confusing them is the most common mistake readers make.
The water-provider track has settled. 3M agreed to pay public water systems an amount reported at roughly $10.3 billion to $12.5 billion depending on participation, funded through 2036; DuPont, Chemours and Corteva agreed to $1.185 billion; Tyco Fire Products agreed to $750 million; and BASF agreed to $316.5 million. Those funds go to public water utilities for testing and treatment. They do not pay individuals, and their claim windows for eligible Phase 2 water systems closed in mid-2026.
The personal-injury track has not settled. No fund, no claim form, and no global resolution exists for individuals alleging that PFAS exposure caused disease. A kidney-cancer bellwether trial set for October 2025 was taken off the calendar after a surge of new filings, and as of August 2026 no replacement trial date had been announced. The court has been assembling a second bellwether pool of 28 cases built around drinking-water exposure — reported as eight each of kidney cancer, testicular cancer and thyroid disease, plus four ulcerative colitis claims. Nothing about that schedule is a prediction of outcome, and no court has found any defendant liable on these claims.
Our AFFF firefighting foam page tracks that MDL in more detail.
Free settlement alerts
Get notified when new class actions open to claims
Join thousands of readers who get the latest class action settlements you may qualify for — delivered straight to your inbox.
Is PFAS in Drinking Water Regulated?
Yes, though the rules are in flux. In April 2024 the EPA set the first national drinking-water limits for PFAS, including maximum contaminant levels of 4 parts per trillion for PFOA and for PFOS. In May 2026 the agency proposed two changes: keeping those 4 ppt limits for PFOA and PFOS but letting water systems request additional time, moving the compliance deadline from 2029 to 2031; and rescinding the federal limits for PFHxS, PFNA and HFPO-DA — the GenX chemicals — along with the hazard index that regulated mixtures of those compounds plus PFBS.Both are proposals, not final rules. The EPA took public comment through July 2026 and has said it intends to finalize before the end of 2026. What that means for a household is narrow but real: the two most-studied PFAS stay regulated at the same level, utilities get longer to install treatment, and several other PFAS compounds would lose their federal drinking-water limit if the rescission is finalized.
PFAS Class Action Settlements
A number of PFAS-related class actions have already resolved. These show how PFAS claims have been handled:• $5,000,000 3M PFAS Settlement — In 2022, 3M Company resolved a PFAS class action for a $5,000,000 fund over allegations it had polluted soil, groundwater, surface water, sediment, air, and fish by discharging certain PFAS substances.
• $5,000,000 Thinx Underwear PFAS Settlement — In 2023, Thinx resolved a class action over allegations that some of its underwear may have contained PFAS chemicals.
• $1,400,000 Knix PFAS Class Action Settlement — In 2024, Knix resolved a $1,400,000 class action over allegations that its products contained synthetic PFAS substances.
• $27,000,000 Hoosick Falls PFOA Settlement — a New York community water-contamination settlement covering property damage and a medical-monitoring program. Its claim deadline has passed.
Separately, state governments and federal regulators have extracted much larger PFAS recoveries that pay governments rather than individuals. New Jersey's settlements with the DuPont entities and 3M, approved in August 2026 at roughly $2.5 billion, fund cleanup and drinking-water treatment with no consumer claim form. Chemours separately reached a $450,000,000 settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice, and New York sued 3M and DuPont in July 2026. Reading a headline about a multibillion-dollar PFAS settlement and assuming there is a check to claim is the single most common misunderstanding in this area — most of that money is cleanup funding.
Newer consumer cases are testing whether PFAS in ordinary products has to be disclosed. Those include claims over PFAS residues on Driscoll's strawberries, Sprouts' compostable packaging, and PFAS in firefighter turnout gear. These are unproven allegations, and none of them has a claim form.
If your PFAS exposure came from firefighting foam at or near a military base, see our related AFFF Firefoam PFAS Water Contamination Lawsuit page.
How Do I Qualify?
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has reported that many Americans have had exposure to PFAS, often at relatively low concentrations. Researchers have associated PFAS exposure with a range of potential health effects, including:• Reproductive health effects
• Increased blood pressure in pregnant women
• Decreased fertility
• Low birth weight in children
• Developmental delays in children
• Accelerated puberty
• Variations in bone density
• Increased risk of prostate, kidney, and testicular cancers
• Reduced immune response, including reduced ability to fight infections
• Reduced vaccine response
• Interference with the body's natural hormone processes
• Increased cholesterol levels
• Increased risk of obesity
If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS and you believe your health was affected, consult a qualified medical professional about your symptoms.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are PFAS forever chemicals?
PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are a large family of synthetic chemicals used in industrial production, oil processing, and many consumer products. They are called forever chemicals because they do not break down easily and can accumulate in water, soil, and the human body. PFOA and PFOS are two of the most studied PFAS compounds.
How are people exposed to PFAS?
Common exposure routes include contaminated drinking water, nonstick cookware, certain clothing and cosmetics, and firefighting foams such as AFFF. The EPA has reported that many Americans have had some level of PFAS exposure, often at relatively low concentrations.
What health effects are associated with PFAS?
Researchers have associated PFAS exposure with effects including certain cancers (such as kidney and testicular cancer), thyroid disease, reproductive and developmental effects, immune-system effects, and increased cholesterol, among others studied by the EPA and public-health researchers.
Is there a settlement or anything to claim yet?
Not for individuals. The large PFAS settlements you have seen in headlines — 3M's multibillion-dollar agreement, the DuPont, Chemours and Corteva agreement, Tyco's and BASF's — pay public water systems for testing and treatment, and their claim windows for eligible Phase 2 water systems closed in mid-2026. State settlements such as New Jersey's fund government cleanup. The personal-injury track in MDL 2873, which is where an individual claim would live, has not settled: there is no fund, no claim form and no announced payout. This page is informational and not legal advice, and eligibility would depend on the facts of an individual case.
My water utility got PFAS settlement money. Does any of it reach me?
Not as a payment. The water-provider settlements reimburse public water systems for the cost of testing for PFAS and installing treatment, so the benefit reaches a household as treated water rather than a check. Those funds are also not a finding that any particular person was harmed. A personal-injury claim over a PFAS-linked diagnosis is a separate matter from a utility's recovery, and nothing in the utility settlements resolves or pays it.
Sources
• U.S. EPA — Our Current Understanding of the Human Health and Environmental Risks of PFAS• U.S. EPA — Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) drinking water regulations
• U.S. EPA — Proposed PFAS Rescission Rule (May 2026)
• U.S. EPA — Proposed PFOA and PFOS Compliance Extension Rule (May 2026)
• U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina — MDL 2873 (Aqueous Film-Forming Foams) case management orders
• Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation — pending MDL statistics
• New Jersey Office of the Attorney General — Federal Court Approves Historic PFAS Settlements (August 7, 2026)
