Webull 2% Transfer Bonus Class Action Quietly Ends
Brokerage Promotions · Case Dismissed

Webull's 2% Transfer Bonus Class Action Ends in a Voluntary Dismissal — Nothing for Other Customers to Claim

Published July 3, 2026

The proposed class action was dismissed before any class was certified, weeks after a settlement notice hit the docket. Webull customers who say they were shorted on a transfer bonus get no fund, no claim form, and no payment from this case.

Stock market price chart of the kind shown in brokerage trading apps like Webull

What Is This About?

A proposed class action accusing Webull Financial LLC of promising customers a 2% bonus for transferring money and retirement accounts to the platform — and then failing to pay the full bonus — has quietly come to an end. A Notice of Settlement was filed on the case docket on February 15, 2026, and the plaintiff filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal in mid-March 2026, closing the case.

The case is Sacchi v. Webull Financial LLC, No. 1:25-cv-10334-JSR, filed December 12, 2025 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York before Judge Jed S. Rakoff. Because the case ended before any class was certified, the resolution covers only the named plaintiff's individual claims — there is no class-wide fund and nothing for other Webull customers to file.

Status Voluntarily Dismissed — March 2026 Notice of Settlement filed February 15, 2026 · voluntary dismissal filed March 12 and signed March 16, 2026
The Promotion at Issue 2% Account Transfer Bonus Complaint alleged Webull promised 2% of the transferred amount but did not pay the full bonus
Can I Claim? No — No Class Fund or Claim Form No class was certified; the case ended as an individual resolution

What the Lawsuit Alleged

The complaint was brought by a New Jersey senior citizen and stroke survivor who said Webull solicited him in 2024 to move significant investment and retirement money to the platform with the promise of a 2% bonus on the transferred amount, payable as long as the account stayed at or above the transferred level for a specified period. He alleged he met those conditions, that Webull failed to pay the full bonus anyway, and that the company denied his repeated written requests for payment before he hired a lawyer.

The suit alleged this was not a one-off error but a systematic practice: according to the complaint, limited discovery in an earlier New Jersey state-court case indicated Webull uses identical bonus promotions nationwide — the proposed class covered 2%, 1%, and 3% transfer-bonus offers — and runs its marketing, contracting, and customer service operations for those accounts from its Wall Street offices in Manhattan. The complaint asserted claims for fraud, deceptive acts and practices under New York General Business Law § 349, false advertising under GBL § 350, breach of contract, and breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing, and sought statutory and punitive damages plus an injunction against the solicitation practices. It pegged the aggregate class claims at more than $5 million.

All of these were allegations in a complaint. Webull never answered on the merits, no court ruled on any of the claims, and the case ended without any finding of wrongdoing.

It Was Filed as a Class Action — So What Happened?

The case moved fast. Webull was served in late December 2025, its defense lawyers were admitted in January 2026, and Judge Rakoff held an initial telephone conference on January 28, 2026. Two weeks later, on February 15, a Notice of Settlement appeared on the docket. The voluntary dismissal followed in mid-March — roughly three months after filing, and long before any motion for class certification was briefed or decided.

That sequence matters. Filing a class action is only step one: before anyone else's claims are actually part of the case, a judge has to certify the class. That never happened here. Until certification, the only claims in the case are the named plaintiff's own, so the entire lawsuit can end through an individual resolution with that one person — and the docket reflects exactly that pattern: a settlement notice followed by a voluntary dismissal. The terms of any resolution, including whether any amount was paid, do not appear on the public docket.

For everyone else who transferred accounts chasing a Webull bonus, the practical effect is: nothing changes. The proposed class members were never part of the case, so they get no money from it — but their own individual claims are also not released. No class notice went out, and none will. Because there is no class settlement, there is also no settlement administrator, no official settlement website, and no deadline to watch. Be skeptical of any site suggesting Webull customers can file a claim from this case.

The Bigger Picture: Broker Promotions Under Scrutiny

Transfer and deposit bonuses have become a standard weapon in the brokerage customer-acquisition wars, and disputes over their fine print — holding periods, qualifying assets, payout schedules — are increasingly landing in court. Consumer suits against trading platforms are piling up on other fronts too: a class action over Robinhood's sports event contracts claims the platform offers illegal sports gambling, and a similar Oregon suit against Kalshi seeks double users' losses. Finance-app referral and promotional messaging is also the subject of a Washington referral-text investigation that names Webull among the apps consumers report. If a future case over broker bonus promotions produces a class settlement with a claim form, we will cover it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is there a Webull transfer bonus settlement claim form or payment for customers?

No. The case was voluntarily dismissed in March 2026, shortly after the parties filed a Notice of Settlement, and no class was ever certified. There is no settlement fund, no claim form, and no payment to other Webull customers from this case. Any resolution covered the named plaintiff only, and its terms do not appear on the public docket.

What did the lawsuit against Webull allege?

The complaint, filed in December 2025 in the Southern District of New York, alleged that Webull Financial solicited consumers to transfer money and retirement accounts by promising a 2% transfer bonus and then failed to pay the full bonus even when customers kept their account balance at the required level for the required period. It brought claims for fraud, deceptive practices and false advertising under New York General Business Law sections 349 and 350, breach of contract, and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing. Those allegations were never proven, and the case ended without any finding of wrongdoing.

Why does the case end with nothing for the proposed class?

Because the case was resolved and dismissed before any class was certified. Until a judge certifies a class, the only claims actually in the case are the named plaintiff's own, so a pre-certification resolution ends the entire lawsuit without creating a class fund. The proposed class members were never part of the case and receive nothing from it — but their own individual claims are also not released.

What can I do if Webull didn't pay my transfer bonus?

This case does not resolve or release other customers' claims. If you believe a promised transfer or deposit bonus was not paid, review the written terms of the specific promotion you accepted, keep records showing you met the deposit and holding-period conditions, and raise the issue with Webull in writing. Whether any individual claim would succeed is a separate question — this page is informational and is not legal advice.



Sources


For more class actions keep scrolling below.
Status Voluntarily dismissed (March 2026) after a Notice of Settlement
Case Title Sacchi v. Webull Financial LLC
Case Number 1:25-cv-10334-JSR
Court U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
Date Filed December 12, 2025

More on brokerages & finance apps — related coverage