Glossary · Legal Advertising

California Attorney Advertising Rules: Rules of Professional Conduct 7.1–7.3 & Bus. & Prof. Code § 6157

By Steve Levine · Updated July 3, 2026 · 9 min read

Quick Answer

California regulates lawyer advertising with two layers of law that apply at the same time. The Rules of Professional Conduct — Rules 7.1, 7.2, and 7.3 — are the State Bar ethics rules: no false or misleading communications about a lawyer or their services (7.1), the mechanics of paying for and labeling ads (7.2), and strict limits on directly soliciting potential clients (7.3). On top of those, Business & Professions Code § 6157 et seq. is a statute that bans specific ad practices — guaranteeing an outcome, promising quick money, undisclosed impersonations or dramatizations, and contingent-fee ads that hide whether the client pays costs — with extra rules for TV and radio spots. A California lawyer's ad has to clear both.

On this page

Two Layers of Law, One Ad

Most states regulate lawyer advertising through their ethics rules alone. California uses two bodies of law at once:

• The Rules of Professional Conduct (Rules 7.1–7.3) — ethics rules adopted by the California Supreme Court and enforced by the State Bar through attorney discipline. California renumbered these rules in 2018 to track the ABA Model Rule format.
• Business & Professions Code § 6157 et seq. — a statute passed by the Legislature that defines what counts as an "advertisement" and bans a specific list of practices, with added provisions for electronic-media (TV and radio) ads.

The two overlap on purpose. The rules state the broad principle — don't mislead — while the statute names concrete practices the Legislature decided are misleading per se, like guaranteeing a result. An ad that satisfies one layer can still violate the other, so California firms have to comply with both.

Rule 7.1 — No False or Misleading Communications

Rule 7.1 is the umbrella standard everything else builds on:

"A lawyer shall not make a false or misleading communication about the lawyer or the lawyer's services. A communication is false or misleading if it contains a material misrepresentation of fact or law, or omits a fact necessary to make the communication considered as a whole not materially misleading." — California Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 7.1(a)
The key point: an ad can violate Rule 7.1 even when every sentence is literally true. Leaving out a fact the reader needs, presenting a headline verdict as if it were a typical result, or implying a specialization the lawyer doesn't hold can all make a truthful statement misleading. The comments to the rule explain that truthful reports of past results can still mislead if they create an unjustified expectation about what a new client will recover — which is why California legal ads lean on disclaimers and hedged phrasing like "you may be entitled to compensation."

Rule 7.2 — Advertising Mechanics

Rule 7.2 handles the plumbing of legal advertising. A California lawyer may advertise through any written, recorded, or electronic media, but with conditions, including:

• No paying for recommendations. A lawyer generally can't compensate someone for recommending their services. The exceptions are narrow: paying the reasonable costs of advertising itself, fees to a qualified lawyer referral service or legal services plan, buying a law practice, and ordinary nominal gifts that weren't promised in exchange for referrals.
• A responsible name on the ad. Advertising must identify a lawyer or law firm responsible for its content, so there's always someone accountable for what the ad says.

This rule works alongside California's separate statutory bans on "running and capping" — paying non-lawyers to steer clients to a law firm — which the state treats as a serious offense in its own right.

Rule 7.3 — Solicitation Limits

Rule 7.3 draws the line between advertising to the public and targeting a specific person. The core prohibition: a lawyer may not solicit professional employment by live in-person, telephone, or real-time electronic contact when a significant motive is the lawyer's financial gain — unless the person contacted is another lawyer, or has a family, close personal, or prior professional relationship with the lawyer.

Even where contact is otherwise allowed, it becomes prohibited if the target has made known they don't want to be solicited, or if the solicitation involves coercion, duress, or harassment. And targeted written or electronic solicitations — the letters that arrive after an accident or arrest — generally must be clearly labeled as advertising so the recipient knows exactly what they're reading.

The logic is about pressure: a mailed letter can be set aside and evaluated calmly, while a live call from a lawyer moments after a crisis invites hasty decisions. That's why the live-contact ban is stricter than the rules for ads and mailers.

Bus. & Prof. Code § 6157 et seq. — The Statutory Layer

The Business & Professions Code adds a statutory scheme on top of the ethics rules. Section 6157 defines terms (who counts as a licensee, what counts as an advertisement), and the sections that follow name specific prohibited practices:

• § 6157.1 — no false, misleading, or deceptive statement in any advertisement, echoing Rule 7.1 as a matter of statute.
• § 6157.2 — bans particular claims in lawyer ads: any guarantee or warranty of a case's outcome; statements implying the lawyer can get quick cash or a quick settlement; an impersonation of a lawyer or client without disclosure; a dramatization not disclosed as such; and contingent-fee ads that don't state whether the client will be responsible for costs. "No fee unless you win" advertising, for example, has to square with the cost-disclosure requirement.
• § 6158 et seq. — extra requirements for electronic-media ads (TV and radio), including that the message as a whole can't be false or misleading and rebuttable presumptions that certain portrayals — like scenes of money changing hands — are misleading.

Because these are statutes rather than ethics rules alone, they give regulators and courts an additional enforcement path beyond State Bar discipline.

How California Differs From the ABA Model Rules

California's Rules 7.1–7.3 track the same framework as the ABA Model Rules 7.1–7.3 — for decades California used its own distinct numbering, then adopted ABA-style rules effective November 1, 2018. But two differences matter:

• The statutory layer. Most states rely on ethics rules alone. California's § 6157 scheme means specific ad practices are banned by statute, with the Legislature — not just the State Bar — defining the lines.
• Model vs. binding. The ABA Model Rules bind no one; they're a template. What binds a California lawyer is California's adopted version of the rules plus the Business & Professions Code. A compliant ad in another state may still need changes to run in California.

Why It Matters to Class Action Readers

If you follow class actions and settlements, you're surrounded by legal advertising — "you may qualify" pages, injury-intake forms, sponsored placements. California's rules are a big part of why reputable versions of those communications are hedged, labeled, and disclaimed. They're also a practical checklist for spotting an ad that's overselling:

• A guaranteed outcome or dollar figure would violate § 6157.2 outright — no one can promise a result.
• "Fast cash" or "quick settlement" framing is a statutory red flag in California.
• A contingent-fee pitch that never mentions costs leaves out something California law says must be addressed.
• A cold call or DM from a lawyer you've never met about joining a lawsuit runs into Rule 7.3's live-solicitation ban.

It's also why this site labels sponsored placements under its advertising disclosure. Knowing the rules exist helps you read any legal ad — from any state — with the right level of skepticism.

Frequently Asked Questions

What laws govern attorney advertising in California?

Two layers apply at the same time. The California Rules of Professional Conduct — Rules 7.1, 7.2, and 7.3 — are the State Bar ethics rules: no false or misleading communications, basic advertising mechanics, and limits on directly soliciting potential clients. Separately, Business & Professions Code section 6157 et seq. is a statute that bans specific advertising practices, such as guaranteeing an outcome or advertising a contingent fee without disclosing whether the client is responsible for costs, and adds special rules for TV and radio ads.

What does California Rule of Professional Conduct 7.1 say?

Rule 7.1 is the umbrella standard: a lawyer shall not make a false or misleading communication about the lawyer or the lawyer's services. A statement can violate the rule even if it is literally true — for example, by omitting a fact needed to keep the overall message from misleading, or by presenting past results in a way that creates an unjustified expectation about what a new client will recover.

Can a California lawyer call or message me out of the blue about a case?

Generally no. Rule 7.3 prohibits a lawyer from soliciting professional employment by live in-person, telephone, or real-time electronic contact when a significant motive is the lawyer's financial gain — unless the person contacted is another lawyer or has a family, close personal, or prior professional relationship with the lawyer. Targeted written or electronic solicitations are allowed but generally must be labeled as advertising, and all solicitation stops if you make it known you don't want to be contacted.

What does Business & Professions Code section 6157.2 prohibit?

Section 6157.2 bans specific claims in California lawyer ads, including any guarantee or warranty of a case's outcome, statements implying quick cash or a quick settlement, impersonations of a lawyer or client without disclosure, dramatizations that aren't disclosed as such, and contingent-fee ads that don't state whether the client will be responsible for costs.

How do California's rules differ from the ABA Model Rules?

California's Rules 7.1–7.3 follow the same framework as ABA Model Rules 7.1–7.3 — California renumbered its rules to track the ABA format in 2018 — but California adds a statutory layer most states don't have: Business & Professions Code section 6157 et seq., which spells out banned advertising practices by statute and includes presumptions for TV and radio ads. The ABA Model Rules themselves aren't binding anywhere; only a state's adopted rules are.


Sources

• State Bar of California — Rules of Professional Conduct (Current Rules)
• California Legislative Information — Bus. & Prof. Code, Article 9.5 (Legal Advertising)

About This Page

General informational summary of California's legal-ethics and advertising statutes, not legal advice. The rules that actually govern any particular lawyer are the current versions adopted in California, including the comments and related State Bar ethics opinions, which contain qualifications this summary condenses. Lawyers with questions about their own advertising should consult the State Bar's rules and ethics opinions directly.

More on Legal Advertising & California Law

More Class Actions

$59.5M Flo Period Tracker Privacy Settlement
No Proof Privacy Settlement

$59.5M Flo Period Tracker Privacy Settlement

Pro Rata Cash (No Proof) · California users get a 2× share · Claim by Oct 15, 2026
Total Vision Data Breach Settlement (California)
Notice / PIN Data Breach

Total Vision Data Breach Settlement (California)

Pro Rata Cash (No Proof) or Up to $1,000 · California Residents · Claim by Oct 5, 2026
MG217 Coal Tar Shampoo Settlement — Up to $7 a Bottle, No Receipt HOT
3 Days Left No Proof Consumer Products

MG217 Coal Tar Shampoo Settlement — Up to $7 a Bottle, No Receipt

Up to $7 per bottle with no receipt, the full price you paid with one, or a $25 voucher, for anyone who bought MG217 coal tar shampoo since 2021.
Deadline: September 24, 2026
Levoit Air Purifier HEPA Settlement — $10 for Core & EverestAir Buyers HOT
With Proof Consumer Products

Levoit Air Purifier HEPA Settlement — $10 for Core & EverestAir Buyers

A $10 digital payment for anyone who bought a Levoit Core or EverestAir air purifier or replacement filter labeled True HEPA, HEPA or H13 between 2019 and 2023.
Deadline: November 3, 2026