Crimson Wine Data Breach Settlement: $100 or Up to $5,000
Data Breach · Claims Open

Crimson Wine Group Data Breach Settlement — About $100 With No Documentation, or Up to $5,000 in Documented Losses

Published August 26, 2026

This settlement resolves claims over a June 2024 cyberattack on Crimson Wine Group, the Napa, California wine producer, in which files holding names, Social Security numbers and financial account information were accessed. If you were notified, a $637,500 fund pays a flat cash payment estimated at $100 with no documentation at all, or up to $5,000 in documented losses instead — and two years of credit monitoring either way.

Glasses of red wine on a tasting room counter — Crimson Wine Group data breach class action settlement

Current Status

Claims are open, and the window is short. The deadline to file is September 1, 2026. The settlement resolves Kaplan v. Crimson Wine Group, Ltd., Case No. 25CV001571, in the Superior Court of California for the County of Napa, and it has not received final approval yet. No payment date has been announced. If a notice reached you, have it in hand before you sit down to file — with less than a week left, an unresolved missing-notice problem is the thing most likely to cost someone their claim.

Status Claims Open closing soon · not yet granted final approval
Claim Deadline September 1, 2026 online or by mail
Estimated Payout About $100, or up to $5,000 $637,500 fund · the $100 is an estimate, not a fixed figure · two years of credit monitoring alongside either route
Proof Required Yes documentation for the $5,000 tier · have the notice you were sent when you file online

What Changed Recently?

The settlement is open and closing shortly. Crimson Wine Group, Ltd. has agreed to a $637,500 settlement to resolve the class action, and the claim portal, the notice and the settlement documents are live on the official settlement website. The complaint was filed on July 30, 2025 in Napa County Superior Court; the parties agreed to settle rather than carry the costs, risks and uncertainties of continuing the litigation.

Crimson Wine Group denies the allegations, and no court has found that it did anything wrong.

What the Case Is About

Crimson Wine Group, Ltd. is a wine producer headquartered in Napa, California, with estates across several West Coast growing regions. According to the settlement, a targeted cyberattack on the company's computer systems in or about June 2024 gave an attacker access to files that may have contained personal information, including names, Social Security numbers and financial account information.

The underlying complaint described a broader set of data and a specific window. It alleged that a cyberattack between June 26 and June 30, 2024 compromised the personal data of at least 26,000 people, including names, addresses, Social Security numbers, driver's license numbers, financial information, medical information and dates of birth. Those figures come from the complaint and are allegations rather than findings.

What makes this combination worth taking seriously is not the size of the class — 26,000 is small as these things go — but the composition of the data. A name paired with a Social Security number and a date of birth is the raw material for opening credit in someone else's name, and none of the three can be reissued the way a compromised card number can.

Who Qualifies?

The Settlement Class covers people nationwide whose private information was involved in the June 2024 incident. Membership turns on whether your information was caught up in the attack and you were identified as affected, not on whether you ever bought anything from the company — which is why the notice sent by the settlement administrator is the practical marker of who is in.

If you believe you were affected but no notice reached you, do not assume you are covered and do not wait. Use the contact route on the official settlement website to reach the administrator, and do it now rather than in the final days before September 1.

How Much Can You Get?

The $637,500 fund pays out along two cash routes plus a monitoring benefit:



The $100 is an estimate, and the distinction matters more here than on a settlement with a larger fund. $637,500 spread across roughly 26,000 notified people is about $24.50 a head before anything is deducted — so the $100 figure assumes that a substantial share of the class never files, which is what usually happens. If claim rates run higher than the administrator projected, the per-person figure comes down. It is a planning number, not a promise.

That arithmetic is also the argument for the documented route if you have anything real to document. The $5,000 ceiling is fixed and does not shrink because other people filed. Anyone who paid for credit monitoring out of pocket after the notice, absorbed a fraudulent charge, or spent money replacing identification should price that path before defaulting to the flat payment.

What Proof or Notice ID Is Required?

The documented tier requires documentation, and it has to connect the loss to this incident — receipts, bank or card statements showing the charge or fee, invoices for a monitoring service you paid for yourself, records of what replacing an ID cost you. Anything a bank, insurer or employer already reimbursed cannot be claimed a second time.

The flat cash payment requires no documentation of loss. Filing online, however, is a different question from documenting a loss: portals for settlements of this size are typically gated on the identifier printed on the notice the administrator mailed or emailed you. That identifier is itself a form of proof, because someone who never received the notice cannot produce it. Find your notice before you start, and if you cannot, contact the administrator through the official settlement website immediately given how little time is left.

What Is the Deadline?

September 1, 2026. The published materials give the date without specifying a cut-off time or a timezone, so treat the date itself as the deadline. With the window this short, filing online rather than by mail removes the postmark question entirely.

The deadlines to exclude yourself from the class or to object are set out in the notice and are separate decisions from filing. Excluding yourself means giving up any payment here to keep the right to sue over this incident on your own. Doing nothing means you stay in the class, receive nothing, and are still bound by the release if the settlement is approved.

How Do You Take Action?

File on the official settlement website, Crimson Wine Settlement, which is the only court-authorized site for this case. Decide between the flat payment and the documented tier before you begin, and enroll in the credit monitoring in the same sitting.

If you are claiming documented losses, attach the records with the form. A documented claim filed without documentation is the most common way this kind of claim ends up paying nothing.

What Happens Next?

The claim window closes September 1, 2026. After that the Court will consider whether to grant final approval at a fairness hearing; the date is set out in the notice on the official settlement website.

A hearing being held is not the same as approval being granted, and approval is not the same as payments going out. No payment date has been announced. Money in settlements of this shape moves only after final approval and after any appeals are resolved. We will update this page when the Court rules and again if a distribution date is published.

Sources and Verification



Questions

Is the $100 cash payment guaranteed?

No. It is described as an estimate, and that word is doing real work. The settlement fund is $637,500, and roughly 26,000 people were notified. After documented-loss claims, two years of credit monitoring for everyone who wants it, notice and administration costs, attorneys' fees and any service award are taken out, what remains is divided among the people who chose the flat cash option. If more people claim it than the administrator projected, the figure comes down. If fewer claim, it can go up. Treat $100 as a planning number rather than a promise.

Can I take the estimated $100 and also claim documented losses?

Data breach settlements built this way almost always make the flat cash payment an alternative to the documented tier rather than an addition to it, which is why it is usually called an alternative cash payment. The Claim Form is the document that settles the question for this case, and it states the election in binding terms. Read it before you submit, because the choice cannot be revisited after the deadline. Credit monitoring normally sits outside that choice and can be taken alongside whichever cash route you pick.

What information was involved in the Crimson Wine breach?

The settlement describes a targeted cyberattack on Crimson Wine Group's computer systems in or about June 2024, in which accessed files may have contained personal information including names, Social Security numbers and financial account information. The underlying complaint alleged a broader set, including addresses, dates of birth, driver's license numbers and medical information, for at least 26,000 people. A name paired with a Social Security number and a date of birth is the core material for identity theft, and unlike a card number none of those three can be reissued.

Why is a California state court handling this instead of a federal court?

The case was filed in the Superior Court of California for the County of Napa, where Crimson Wine Group is based, as Kaplan v. Crimson Wine Group, Ltd., Case No. 25CV001571. Data breach class actions can proceed in either system depending on how the claims are pleaded and whether the parties seek to move the case. For a class member the practical difference is small: the settlement is still supervised and has to be approved by a judge, the class release still binds you if you do nothing, and the deadline still governs.

I bought wine from one of the company's brands. Does that make me a class member?

Not by itself. Membership turns on whether your personal information was involved in the incident and you were identified as affected, not on whether you were a customer. The notice sent by the settlement administrator is the practical marker. If you believe you were affected but never received one, use the contact route on the official settlement website to reach the administrator well before the deadline rather than assuming you are covered.



For more class actions keep scrolling below.
Settlement Amount $637,500
Case Title Kaplan v. Crimson Wine Group, Ltd.
Case Number 25CV001571
Court Superior Court of California, County of Napa
Official Website Crimson Wine Settlement

More Open Data Breach Settlements