Dollar Tree and Family Dollar job applicants and employees whose Social Security numbers were exposed in the 2023 Zeroed-In Technologies breach may be covered by a proposed class action alleging Zeroed-In failed to protect their data. No class has been certified and there is nothing to file yet.
This article describes a pending class action. The claims are unproven allegations. Zeroed-In Technologies, Dollar Tree and Family Dollar have not been found liable, there is no certified class, and there is nothing to claim at this time. This page is informational and is not legal advice.
Free settlement alerts
Join thousands of readers who get the latest class action settlements you may qualify for — delivered straight to your inbox.
There is no settlement as of October 21, 2026. The plaintiffs and Zeroed-In Technologies mediated on December 9, 2025 without reaching a deal and told the court in April 2026 that settlement discussions would continue. There is no claim form or deadline.
On March 26, 2025, U.S. District Judge Brendan A. Hurson ruled that 22 of the named plaintiffs had agreed to arbitration agreements with Dollar Tree, including a waiver of class claims, so their claims against Dollar Tree and Family Dollar must be arbitrated individually. The ruling turned on the arbitration agreements those employees accepted; claims against the vendor, Zeroed-In, were not part of it.
Zeroed-In Technologies reported that an unauthorized party accessed its systems on August 7 and 8, 2023 and that names, dates of birth and Social Security numbers were exposed. Its notice to the Maine Attorney General put the number of affected people at about 1,977,486, mostly applicants and current and former employees tied to Dollar Tree and Family Dollar.
Dollar Tree Management, LLC sued Zeroed-In Technologies in federal court in Norfolk, Virginia, on April 18, 2025, in a contract dispute over the scope of Zeroed-In’s alleged obligation to indemnify Dollar Tree for the breach. On October 28, 2025, the judge denied Dollar Tree’s request for an early ruling on its declaratory judgment claim because Zeroed-In disputes material facts.