Carter Credit Union Data Breach Settlement — $50 With No Proof or Up to $2,500 Documented
PublishedSeptember 9, 2026
People whose personal information was compromised in the June 2025 cyberattack on Carter Credit Union may qualify to claim a flat $50 with no proof, or instead up to $2,500 in documented out-of-pocket losses, plus three years of credit monitoring that can be claimed either way. Claims close November 19, 2026, and the Login ID and PIN from the notice are required to file online.
Claims are open. The deadline to file is November 19, 2026, online, by email or postmarked. The deadlines to
opt out or to object fall a full month earlier, on October 20, 2026. The Court has scheduled a Final Approval
Hearing for November 30, 2026 at 9:30 a.m. Central Time in Shreveport, Louisiana, and the settlement has not
been approved yet. No payment date has been announced: the Notice says payments are distributed only if the
Court grants final approval and after any appeals are resolved, and that it is not known whether appeals
will be filed. If a notice reached you, it carries the Login ID and PIN you need to file online.
StatusClaims Openfinal approval hearing November 30, 2026 in Shreveport, Louisiana
Claim DeadlineNovember 19, 2026online, by email or postmarked · opting out and objecting close a month earlier, on October 20
Estimated Payout$50 or up to $2,500a stated $50 with no proof, or documented losses instead — one or the other · three years of credit monitoring either way
Proof RequiredYes — ID to file onlineno receipts for the $50 tier, but the online form opens on a Login ID and PIN screen · a printed form mailed in treats the Notice ID as optional
What Changed Recently?
The settlement is newly open to claims. Carter Credit Union d/b/a Carter Federal Credit Union has agreed to
resolve Ellis, et al. v. Carter Credit Union d/b/a Carter Federal Credit Union, Case No. 662980-C,
in the 1st Judicial District Court for the Parish of Caddo, Louisiana, and the Court has authorized notice to
the class. Simpluris is administering it, and the claim portal, the long-form notice, the claim form and the
settlement agreement are live on the official settlement website.
Carter Credit Union denies that it did anything wrong, and the Court has not decided who is right. The
Notice states that both sides agreed to settle to avoid the costs, risks, disruptions and uncertainties of
continuing the litigation. No finding of liability has been made.
Free settlement alerts
Get notified when new class actions open to claims
Join thousands of readers who get the latest class action settlements you may qualify for — delivered straight to your inbox.
What the Case Is About
According to the Notice, the case concerns a targeted cyberattack on Carter Credit Union's computer systems
in June 2025, during which files containing private information were accessed. The Class definition dates
the incident to on or about June 25, 2025.
The Notice says those files may have contained names, addresses, Social Security numbers, driver's license
and government-issued ID numbers, financial information such as account numbers and credit or debit card
numbers, medical information, health insurance information, dates of birth, and other personally
identifiable or protected health information the credit union collected and maintained.
The financial fields are what make this one different from a typical retailer breach. A credit union holds
account numbers alongside the Social Security number, date of birth and government ID that a fraudster needs
to pass identity verification on a new account — the combination that makes account takeover and new-account
fraud possible rather than just card fraud. Cards get reissued; the rest of that file does not change. The
three years of monitoring offered here is a year longer than most breach settlements provide, which fits the
data involved.
The Notice also mentions that Carter Credit Union's records indicate class members are entitled to benefits,
and that some people may have received an earlier notice directly from the credit union before this
court-authorized one. If you remember a letter about this in 2025 and then a second notice arrived, that is
the sequence being described, not a duplicate.
Who Qualifies?
The Court defined the Class as all persons whose personally identifiable information was compromised because
of the Data Incident experienced by Carter Credit Union beginning on or about June 25, 2025.
There is no residency requirement in that definition, which is the point most likely to be misread. The case
sits in a Louisiana state court in Shreveport and Carter Credit Union is a Louisiana institution, but the
class is defined by whose information was compromised, not by where they live. Someone who has since moved
out of state is still a class member.
Three groups are excluded: Carter Credit Union along with its officers, directors and related companies;
attorneys for the parties; and the judge in the case, along with the judge's family and staff.
How Much Can You Get?
There are three benefits, and the way they combine is worth getting right before you open the form:
Credit monitoring — three years of CyEx Financial Shield Complete. Available to every Settlement Class Member, with $1 million of financial fraud insurance and monitoring for fraud or identity theft, unauthorized financial transactions, and personal information appearing in high-risk transactions, plus access to a fraud resolution agent if something suspicious related to the incident turns up.
Reimbursement of out-of-pocket losses — up to $2,500. For actual, documented out-of-pocket losses incurred between June 25, 2025 and November 19, 2026 that are fairly traceable to the incident: money lost to identity theft or fraud, fees for credit reports, credit monitoring or freezing and unfreezing credit, the cost of replacing IDs, and postage to contact banks by mail.
Alternative cash payment — a one-time $50. No proof or explanation required.
The Notice's phrasing is "Credit Monitoring and/or one of the two cash payment options," and the Claim Form
makes the rest explicit: do not claim the $50 if you are claiming documented losses, and do not claim
documented losses if you are taking the $50. So the monitoring stacks with either cash option or can be
taken on its own, while the two cash options are mutually exclusive.
The $50 is stated as an amount rather than an estimate, and that is genuinely unusual. Most breach
settlements publish an "estimated" flat payment drawn from a fixed fund, which shrinks pro rata when claims
run higher than the administrator projected — the mechanism our explainer on
pro rata distribution
walks through. The Carter Credit Union Notice discloses no settlement fund figure, no aggregate cap and no
pro rata reduction, and calls the benefit a one-time cash payment of $50.00. Take that as what the Notice
says rather than as a guarantee against every contingency, but on its face there is no published mechanism
here that would cut the figure.
Which option to take is straightforward arithmetic for most people: $50 costs nothing but a few minutes,
while the documented tier is worth reaching for only if your out-of-pocket losses since June 2025 exceeded
$50 and you can document them. There is no partial credit for trying — a documented-loss claim that
fails is not automatically converted to the $50 here, unlike some settlements that build in that fallback.
Expenses already reimbursed by a third party cannot be claimed.
What Proof Is Required?
Filing online requires the Login ID and PIN printed on the notice mailed to you. The settlement website says
so plainly — to start the online claim form you must log in with those credentials, and you find them on the
notice that was sent to you — which is why this page treats the settlement as Proof Required: Yes
even though the $50 tier asks for no receipts at all.
The paper route is looser: the downloadable Claim Form asks for a Notice ID only "if known," and it can be
completed and returned by mail or as an emailed image. That is a real escape hatch for someone who never
received a notice, but it is an envelope or an attachment rather than an open online door, so it does not
make this a no-proof settlement.
Past that credential, the burden splits sharply between the two cash options:
Alternative cash payment, $50: nothing. The Notice states that you do not have to provide any proof or explanation to claim this payment.
Out-of-pocket losses, up to $2,500: proof such as bank statements or receipts showing what you spent or lost. The Claim Form asks you to itemize each expense with a description of the supporting documentation and an amount, and to total them.
The documented tier carries a requirement worth reading twice: the losses must be fairly traceable
to the Data Incident, and the Notice says your proof or notes should show that your expenses were because of
the incident. A bank statement proving money left your account is not by itself proof that this breach is
why. Notes or papers you wrote yourself can be submitted to explain or support other documentation, but the
Notice says they are not enough on their own to make a valid claim. The whole Claim Form is signed under
penalty of perjury, and the Notice says claims are subject to verification and that the administrator may
ask for supplemental information before treating a claim as complete and valid.
What Are the Deadlines?
Three dates, with the two that decide your legal rights falling first — and by an unusually wide margin:
October 20, 2026 — opt out. A Request for Exclusion must be postmarked by this date, carrying the case name and number, your full name, mailing address, telephone number and email address, your personal signature, and the words "Request for Exclusion" or a clear equivalent. You may only exclude yourself, not anyone else.
October 20, 2026 — object. A complete objection must be filed with the Clerk of Court by this date, with a copy sent to the Settlement Administrator.
November 19, 2026 — submit a claim. Online or by email by this date, or the completed and signed Claim Form with any supporting documentation postmarked no later than this date.
The thirty-day gap is the practical trap, and it is wider here than on most breach settlements, where the two
dates sit a fortnight apart. Anyone weighing whether to keep the right to sue Carter Credit Union
individually has to decide by October 20, because there is no way to opt out afterward even though claims
stay open another month. Our glossary entry on
opting out of a class action
covers what that choice trades away.
The objection requirements are lighter than many. Beyond your grounds and any legal support for them, an
objector must give their contact details, list any cases in which they or their lawyer have objected in the
past four years with the names, courts and civil action numbers, say whether they would like to speak at the
final approval hearing, and sign it personally — a lawyer's signature alone is not sufficient. The Notice
says an objection must meet each of these requirements to be valid.
Objecting does not cost you the money. The Notice confirms that a class member who objects may also file a
claim for settlement benefits. Opting out does: an opt-out cannot object, and receives no cash and no
monitoring.
How Do You File?
Claims go through the official settlement website,
CCU Data Settlement.com,
run by Simpluris. The Notice calls filing online the fastest route: log in with the Login ID and PIN from
your notice, tick the credit monitoring, then either check the $50 alternative payment or itemize documented
losses with supporting documentation, and sign.
The Claim Form asks how you want to be paid, and the options are broader than most: PayPal, Venmo, Zelle, a
virtual prepaid card, or a physical check mailed to the address you provide. Choosing an electronic method is
worth a moment's thought, since a mailed check is the slowest of the five and the easiest to lose in a move.
If you prefer paper, the same site hosts a downloadable Claim Form that can be returned by mail with any
supporting documentation, postmarked by November 19, 2026, or sent to the administrator as an emailed image
of the completed form by the same date. Keep a copy of whatever you submit. Filing is free, and class
members are not charged for Class Counsel's services.
Who Pays the Fees
Carter Credit Union does, separately — which works in class members' favor and is the structural detail that
most distinguishes this settlement. The Court appointed Leigh S. Montgomery of Ellzey Kherkher Sanford
Montgomery, LLP; Mariya Weekes of Milberg, PLLC; and A. Brooke Murphy of the Murphy Law Firm as Class
Counsel. They will ask the Court to approve $400,000 as reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of litigation,
and service awards of $2,000 for each of the nine class representatives. The Notice states that both are
paid on behalf of Carter Credit Union.
On a common-fund settlement the opposite is true: fees and awards come off the top of a fixed pot before
anyone is paid, which is why so many flat payments are published as estimates that later shrink. Here the
Notice describes no such pot, so the $400,000 and the service awards do not sit between claimants and their
money. The Court will rule on both requests at the final approval hearing and may award less than what is
asked.
What You Give Up
Staying in the Class means you cannot be part of any other lawsuit against Carter Credit Union about the
issues this settlement covers. Section VII of the Settlement Agreement sets out the claims released, and the
agreement is posted on the official settlement website.
Doing nothing does not avoid that release. A class member who never files still gives up those claims and
receives no cash and no monitoring — the only way to keep the right to sue Carter Credit Union on your own
is to opt out by October 20, 2026. Given that the $50 requires no receipts and takes minutes, doing nothing
is the one option with no upside at all.
What Happens Next?
At the November 30, 2026 hearing the Court will decide whether to approve the settlement, will decide how
Class Counsel should be paid and whether to award the service awards, and will consider any objections.
Nobody is required to attend — the Notice says Class Counsel will answer the Court's questions, and that a
properly filed objection will be considered whether or not the objector appears. The Notice also warns that
the date and time may change without further notice, so the settlement website is the place to confirm.
If approval is granted, payments follow only after any appeals are resolved. A hearing being held is not the
same as approval being granted, and approval being granted is not the same as payments being released. The
Notice is candid that it is unknown whether appeals will be filed or how long they would take, so no payment
date exists yet.
Class Action Summary
Case Title
Ellis, et al. v. Carter Credit Union d/b/a Carter Federal Credit Union
Case Number
662980-C
Court
1st Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo, Louisiana
Defendant
Carter Credit Union d/b/a Carter Federal Credit Union
Incident
June 2025 targeted cyberattack on Carter Credit Union's computer systems, beginning on or about June 25, 2025
Data Involved
Names, addresses, Social Security numbers, driver's license and government ID numbers, financial account and card information, medical and health insurance information, and dates of birth
Class Scope
All persons whose PII was compromised in the incident — no residency requirement
Cash Benefit
A one-time $50 with no proof, or up to $2,500 documented — one or the other
Monitoring
3 years CyEx Financial Shield Complete · $1M fraud insurance · claimable alongside either cash option or alone
Fees
$400,000 plus $2,000 service awards, paid on behalf of Carter Credit Union rather than from a class fund
Claim Deadline
November 19, 2026
Opt-Out / Object By
October 20, 2026
Final Approval Hearing
November 30, 2026 at 9:30 AM Central (Shreveport, LA)
Can I claim the credit monitoring and a cash payment?
Yes. The Notice says all Settlement Class Members may claim Credit Monitoring and/or one of the two
cash payment options, so the three years of CyEx Financial Shield Complete can be taken alongside
either cash option or entirely on its own. What you cannot do is combine the two cash options: the
Claim Form tells filers not to claim the $50 alternative payment if they are claiming documented
losses, and not to claim documented losses if they are taking the $50.
Is the $50 payment really $50, or an estimate?
The Notice states it as a one-time cash payment of $50.00, not as an estimate, and it describes no
aggregate cap and no pro rata reduction. That is unusual — most breach settlements publish an
estimated flat payment that shrinks if claims run high. Nothing in the settlement documents
guarantees the figure against every possible contingency, but on the face of the Notice the $50 is a
stated amount rather than a projection.
Do attorneys' fees reduce what class members receive?
Not according to the Notice. Class Counsel will ask the Court to approve $400,000 in attorneys' fees
and costs, and service awards of $2,000 for each of the nine class representatives, and the Notice
states that both are paid on behalf of Carter Credit Union. That is the opposite of a common-fund
settlement, where fees come off the top of the money available to claimants before anyone is paid.
The Court will rule on both requests at the final approval hearing and may award less than what is
asked.
What does "fairly traceable" mean for the $2,500 tier?
It means the documentation has to connect the expense to this incident, not merely show that money
was spent. The Notice requires losses to have occurred between June 25, 2025 and November 19, 2026
and to be fairly traceable to the Data Incident, and it says your proof or notes should show that
your expenses were because of the Data Incident. Notes or papers you wrote yourself can support
other documentation but are not enough on their own, and expenses already reimbursed by a third
party cannot be claimed at all.
Why is the opt-out deadline a month before the claim deadline?
The two dates serve different purposes and the settlement schedules them apart. Opting out and
objecting both close October 20, 2026, because the Court needs those responses in hand before the
November 30 final approval hearing; claims stay open until November 19, 2026. The practical effect
is that anyone considering keeping the right to sue Carter Credit Union individually has to decide a
full month before the claim window shuts, and there is no way to opt out after October 20.
Is the class limited to Louisiana?
No. The case is in a Louisiana state court in Shreveport and Carter Credit Union is a Louisiana
institution, but the Court defined the Class as all persons whose PII was compromised because of the
Data Incident beginning on or about June 25, 2025. No residency requirement is attached, so someone
who has since moved out of state is still a class member.
Official Settlement Notice
For more class actions keep scrolling below.
Settlement Amount
No fund figure disclosed the Notice describes no aggregate cap and no pro rata reduction · fees of $400,000 and the service awards are paid on behalf of Carter Credit Union
Case Title
Ellis, et al. v. Carter Credit Union d/b/a Carter Federal Credit Union
Case Number
662980-C
Court
1st Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo, Louisiana
Final Approval Hearing
November 30, 2026 at 9:30 AM Central Shreveport, Louisiana · date and time may change without further notice
Southern Graphics Data Breach Settlement: Up to $3,500 documented or a pro rata cash payment instead — the same either/or shape, but the flat side there is a share of a $750,000 fund rather than a stated figure. Compare the two →
FinWise Bank Data Breach Settlement: Up to $5,000 in documented losses from a breach of financial account records, with the same credential gate on the online claim form. Check the deadline →
California Casualty Data Breach Settlement: A flat $50 with no documentation or a documented-loss claim instead, plus two years of credit monitoring, from a September 2025 cyberattack on the insurer. Compare the tiers →
ConnectOnCall Data Breach Settlement: A $75 flat payment with no proof, and a portal that serves a blank claim form to anyone who never received a notice. See who qualifies →
How Data Breach Class Actions Work: What these settlements typically pay, why the documented tier is usually worth more than the flat cash, and what a release actually costs you. Read the explainer →