Springfield Police Student Officer Wage Settlement: $825,000 Split Pro Rata and Paid Automatically
PublishedSeptember 17, 2026
About 147 people who worked as student police officers for the City of Springfield, Massachusetts between March 24, 2022 and May 10, 2026 will be paid a pro rata share of an $825,000 Massachusetts Wage Act settlement automatically, calculated from the city's own payroll records; there is no claim form to file. Checks are expected to be mailed around January 2027, and the deadline to object is October 24, 2026.
There is no claim form and no claim deadline. Each class member is to be paid a pro rata share
of the $825,000 settlement automatically, calculated from the City of Springfield's payroll
records, and the notice says the payment should be mailed in approximately January 2027. The
court has not ruled. The Palmer District Court may hold a fairness hearing at 2:00 p.m. on
October 27, 2026, though the settlement agreement leaves it to the court whether to schedule
one at all, and no final approval order has been entered. October 24, 2026 is the deadline to
object, by postmark. The notice gives class members two options — object or do nothing — and
describes no procedure for excluding yourself from the class.
Free settlement alerts
Get notified when new class actions open to claims
Join thousands of readers who get the latest class action settlements you may qualify for — delivered straight to your inbox.
StatusPending — Automatic PaymentNotice mailed · a fairness hearing may be held October 27, 2026 · no final approval order entered
Key DeadlineOctober 24, 2026Objection postmark deadline · there is no claim deadline and the notice describes no opt-out procedure
Estimated PayoutPro rata share of $825KScaled to each person's estimated damages in the city's payroll records · your own estimate is printed on your notice · about 147 class members · fees, the service award, administration and payroll taxes come out of the same $825,000
Proof RequiredAutomatic PaymentNo claim form — payments are calculated from the City of Springfield's payroll records and mailed
What Changed Recently?
The case and its settlement arrived together. The complaint in Cornet v. City of
Springfield, Civil Action No. 2643-cv-196, was filed in the Palmer District Court in
Hampden County, Massachusetts, and the executed Class Action Settlement Agreement and Release
was filed on June 16, 2026. Notice has since gone out to the class and the settlement website
is live. That structure is why there is no litigation record to read: the parties exchanged
documents and payroll data informally under the Massachusetts Public Records Law, negotiated,
and brought the resolution to the court rather than litigating first.
The dispute is about how student police officers were paid. The complaint asserted class claims
under Massachusetts wage and hour law, and the notice describes the case as being about whether
Springfield violated wage and hour laws relating to the payment of wages. The release names the
Massachusetts Wage Act, M.G.L. c. 149, §§ 148 and 150, among the statutes covered, and describes
the underlying theory as claims that the plaintiff and class members were underpaid wages while
working as student officers.
Those are allegations. The City of Springfield denies the allegations, disputes that it is
liable to anyone on any basis, and denies engaging in unlawful conduct or wrongdoing. The
agreement records the city's position that it complied at all times with applicable law and that
class members were properly compensated for all time worked, and states that the city agreed to
settle to avoid the burden, expense and uncertainty of litigating. No court has found that the
city did anything unlawful.
Who Qualifies?
The class, as the mailed notice and the proposed preliminary approval order define it, is all
persons who are or were employed by the City of Springfield and worked as student police
officers from March 24, 2022 through May 10, 2026. The notice puts the class at approximately
147 people. Membership is not something a person applies for: the city produces a class list
from its personnel and payroll records, so anyone who received the mailed notice is a class
member, and someone who believes they belong on the list but did not receive one can raise that
with the settlement administrator.
One version of the notice adds that five individuals who previously settled and released their
claims are excluded from the settlement class.
The paperwork does not agree with itself on where the class period ends. Section 2 of the settlement agreement ends the class period on
May 10, 2025 rather than 2026, and the payment formula in section 4.6 runs its calculation
period through the payroll period that includes May 10, 2025. The notice, the settlement
website and the preliminary approval order all say May 10, 2026. A class member whose service
falls between those two dates has a reason to contact the administrator before the objection
deadline rather than wait for a check.
How Much Can You Get?
The settlement pays a pro rata share rather than a flat amount, so the figure differs for every
class member and the individual estimate is printed on the notice each person received. The
formula in the agreement divides the net settlement fund according to each class member's
estimated damages during the calculation period as reflected in the city's payroll records:
each person's share is the net fund multiplied by a fraction whose numerator is their own
estimated damages and whose denominator is the estimated damages of the whole class. Someone who
worked more hours as a student officer across the period receives more.
The $825,000 is a ceiling, not a class fund with extras paid on top. Four things come out of it
before the net fund is calculated: attorneys' fees and costs of up to $206,250, which the
agreement describes as approximately 25 percent of the gross fund and which the court will set;
a service award of up to $3,500 for the class representative, also subject to court approval;
settlement administration budgeted at up to $7,175.25; and employer-side and employee-side
payroll taxes and withholdings on the class payments. The agreement states that no additional
funding or payment by the city will be required.
The city funds the money early rather than at the end. Under the agreement the gross settlement
fund is due within ten calendar days of preliminary approval and is transferred to the
administrator, which holds it as a qualified settlement fund under the court's continuing
jurisdiction until distributions and reporting are complete.
The agreement also provides that a settlement payment is not treated as compensation for
purposes of eligibility for health, welfare, unemployment or retirement benefits, and that no
one receiving a payment becomes entitled to any additional or increased benefits because of it.
What Proof or Notice ID Is Required?
None. There is no claim form, no documentation to upload, no attestation and no identifier to
enter. The payment is calculated from the city's own payroll records and mailed to the address
on the class list, which the administrator checks against the National Change of Address
database before the notice goes out and re-checks against a commercial address database if mail
comes back undeliverable.
Documentation matters in one place only, and it is optional: disputing the amount. A class
member who thinks their individual payment, or the estimated damages figure behind it, is wrong
can send the settlement administrator a written notice describing the dispute together with any
records that support it. The city's payroll records control unless the class member establishes
a different figure through documentary evidence. Counsel for both sides then attempt to resolve
the dispute informally, and if they cannot agree the administrator decides, subject to review,
determination and approval by the court. The same deadline that governs objections governs
disputes.
What Is the Deadline?
October 24, 2026 is the date to know. An objection must be postmarked by then and mailed to the
settlement administrator at the address printed on the notice, with a copy to class counsel. To
be effective it has to be in writing, signed by the class member objecting, and include the
name, court and docket number of the case along with the objector's full name, address and
telephone number. The same date is the Bar Date for disputing a calculated payment amount. The
agreement sets the Bar Date at 90 calendar days after the notices are mailed, so October 24 is
that period running out.
A class member who misses the date is foreclosed from objecting to the settlement or opposing
the fee application, except as the court permits. An objector may withdraw an objection at any
time, and objecting does not put the payment at risk — the agreement says a class member who
objects does not waive or lose any right to receive benefits under the settlement.
October 27, 2026 at 2:00 p.m. is the fairness hearing, if the court holds one. Under the
agreement the court may, but is not required to, hold a final fairness hearing at all.
A later deadline lands after the money is mailed. Settlement checks carry an expiration: after
90 days the administrator sends a reminder postcard giving the class member 90 more days and
offering a replacement check on request. A replacement is good for 60 days from issue or 180
days from the date the first check was sent, whichever is later.
How Do You Take Action?
Nothing is required. A class member who does nothing is paid, and the notice's own summary of
options says exactly that: do nothing, receive the presently-estimated payment, give up the
released rights.
The official settlement website is
SPD Settlement.com,
run by the court-appointed administrator, Optime Administration. Its important-documents page
carries the complaint, the settlement agreement and the other court filings, and the site also
lists the key deadlines. A class member who cannot find their estimated payment amount, who
has moved since the notice was mailed, or who believes they were left off the class list can
reach the administrator through that site.
Objecting means mailing a signed letter meeting the requirements above so that it is postmarked
by October 24, 2026. Attending the hearing is optional; a timely written objection is considered
whether or not the objector appears, and a class member may ask the court for permission to
speak.
What Happens Next?
The next milestone is the fairness hearing on October 27, 2026 at the Palmer District Court, if
the court decides to hold one. At that hearing the court would consider whether the settlement
is fair, reasonable and adequate, weigh any objections, and decide the attorneys' fee award and
the service award. The agreement allows the court to grant final approval at or after that
hearing with any modifications the parties agree to, without further notice to the class.
Payments follow final approval and become certain only once approval is final. The agreement
defines the effective date as the fifth court day after the window for rehearing or appellate
review closes with nothing filed, or, if an appeal is taken, after the appellate court affirms
and the time for further review passes. It directs the administrator to pay the individual
settlement payments within ten calendar days after final approval, while the notice tells class
members to expect their check in approximately January 2027 and to be patient if there are
appeals. No firm payment date has been announced.
Money that is never claimed does not go back to the city. Checks still outstanding after the
expiration dates described above, and checks that cannot be delivered after reasonable efforts
to find a current address, are remitted to the Massachusetts IOLTA Committee, and the class
members whose payments are remitted that way remain bound by the release. If the court declines
to approve the settlement, the agreement is void, the parties return to their prior positions
and the city owes nothing.
Sources and Verification
This page is based on the mailed Notice of Class Action Settlement and the notice text
published on the official settlement website for
SPD Settlement.com,
and on the Class Action Settlement Agreement and Release filed on June 16, 2026 in
Cornet v. City of Springfield, Civil Action No. 2643-cv-196, Palmer District Court,
Hampden County, Massachusetts, together with the proposed preliminary approval order and the
proposed final order and judgment filed with it. The agreement is the source for the fund
mechanics, the pro rata formula, the deductions, the dispute procedure, the check expiration
and residual-funds provisions, the qualified settlement fund structure and the scope of the
release; the notice is the source for the deadlines, the hearing date, the class size and the
expected payment timing. The notice is embedded below.
Why is there no way to opt out of this settlement?
The notice offers class members two choices, object or do nothing, and describes no
procedure for excluding yourself. The settlement agreement matches it: the only
member-initiated deadline in the document is the objection Bar Date, and the proposed final
approval order would permanently enjoin every class member from pursuing the released claims
in any forum. Objecting does not cost a class member their payment — the agreement says a
class member who objects does not waive or lose any right to receive settlement benefits.
The class period ends on two different dates in the paperwork — which one governs?
The mailed notice, the settlement website and the proposed preliminary approval order all
define the class as people who worked as student police officers from March 24, 2022 through
May 10, 2026. Section 2 of the settlement agreement instead ends the class period on May 10,
2025, and the payment formula in section 4.6 runs the calculation period through the payroll
period that includes May 10, 2025. The two are not reconciled in the documents. Anyone whose
own dates fall near either cutoff should treat the notice they received as the operative
document and raise a dispute with the settlement administrator before the objection deadline
rather than waiting.
What comes out of the $825,000 before class members are paid?
Four things. Class counsel may request attorneys' fees and costs of up to $206,250, which
the agreement describes as roughly 25 percent of the gross fund. The class representative may
request a service award of up to $3,500. Settlement administration is budgeted at up to
$7,175.25. Employer-side and employee-side payroll taxes and withholdings on the class
payments also come out of the same money. What is left is the net settlement fund that is
divided among class members, and the agreement states that no additional funding or payment
by the city will be required — the $825,000 is the ceiling on everything.
What if the estimated amount printed on the notice looks wrong?
The agreement builds in a dispute process. A class member may challenge both their
individual payment and the underlying damages figure used to calculate it by sending the
settlement administrator a written notice describing the dispute along with any supporting
records, and it has to arrive by the same Bar Date that governs objections. The city's
payroll records control unless the class member establishes a different amount through
documentary evidence. Counsel for both sides then try to resolve the dispute informally, and
if they cannot, the administrator decides, subject to review and approval by the court.
What happens to a settlement check that is never cashed?
After 90 days the administrator sends a reminder postcard telling the class member they
have 90 days left and inviting them to ask for a replacement check. If the postcard comes
back undeliverable, the administrator cancels the original check, runs a skip trace for a
current address and mails a replacement with another copy of the notice. A replacement is
valid for 60 days from issue or 180 days from the date the first check was sent, whichever
is later. Anything still outstanding after that goes to the Massachusetts IOLTA Committee,
and the class members whose money is remitted that way remain fully bound by the release.
Is the release limited to unpaid wage claims?
No. Section 11.1 releases claims that were or reasonably could have been asserted on the facts and theories alleged in the
case, and then lists a long set of Massachusetts statutes by name, among them Chapter 93A,
the Wage Act, the Fair Employment Practices Act, the Civil Rights Act, the Equal Rights Act,
the Equal Pay Act, the state privacy statutes and several leave laws. The release does
preserve the ability to cooperate in a federal, state or local investigation, though class
members give up the right to recover money damages as a result of one.
Official Settlement Notice
For more class actions keep scrolling below.
Settlement Amount
$825,000 Gross fund · covers class payments, attorneys' fees and costs, the service award, administration and payroll taxes · the city owes nothing beyond it
Case Title
Cornet v. City of Springfield
Case Number
2643-cv-196
Court
Palmer District Court, Hampden County, Massachusetts
Final Approval Hearing
October 27, 2026 at 2:00 PM Palmer, Massachusetts · the agreement leaves it to the court whether to hold a hearing at all