Published
August 7, 2026
Updated
August 7, 2026
This page covers the Lyft passenger sexual assault litigation only — the federal MDL created in February 2026, the older California state-court cases coordinated since 2020, and why no Lyft case has yet reached a jury. If a Lyft driver assaulted or harassed you, here is where the Lyft track actually stands.
Attorney Advertising · Not Legal Advice
Allegations Only · No Settlement Yet
This article describes pending lawsuits against Lyft, Inc. The allegations in these cases are unproven, Lyft disputes liability, and no court has found the company liable across this litigation. No Lyft passenger sexual assault case has been tried to a jury verdict. There is no settlement fund and no settlement claim form. This page is informational and is not legal advice.
Time-Sensitive — Don't Wait to Get Advice
Legal deadlines (statutes of limitations) apply to these claims, they vary by state, and once a deadline passes a claim can be barred permanently. This page is an attorney advertisement and a free informational resource — not a law firm. Submitting the form does not create an attorney-client relationship, file anything, or stop any deadline, and it does not guarantee that an attorney will review or respond to your case. Do not wait for a callback. If you are considering a claim, speak with a qualified attorney directly as soon as possible. You are free to choose any attorney you wish — you are never required to use this site or any attorney it connects you with, and OpenClassActions.com does not recommend or endorse any particular lawyer.
Latest Update
August 2026 Update: The federal Lyft docket is small but growing steadily. The JPML statistics report dated August 3, 2026 lists 72 actions pending in MDL No. 3171, up from 54 on June 1 — a third more cases in nine weeks, on a proceeding that did not exist before February 2026. The procedural groundwork went in over the summer: leadership counsel are in place, a master complaint and a template short-form complaint were approved in June, and new plaintiffs can now file directly into the Northern District of California instead of waiting on a transfer. No Lyft case has been tried, no settlement has been announced, and there is no claim form.
Status
Potential Cases Under Review
Individual legal claims · no settlement claim form announced
Pending Federal Actions
72 in MDL No. 3171
JPML count as of August 3, 2026 · 78 total filed to date · up from 54 on June 1 · California state cases are counted separately
Trials Decided
None — no Lyft case has reached a jury
Unlike the Uber litigation, which has three decided verdicts, the Lyft federal proceeding is still in its first year
California State Track
In re Lyft Rideshare Cases — JCCP No. 5061
San Francisco County Superior Court · coordinated since 2020 · older and further along than the federal MDL
Can I Claim?
No — there is nothing to claim from a settlement fund
Survivors may request a free, confidential legal review instead
Deadlines
Time limits apply — and vary by state
Missing a statute of limitations can permanently bar a claim — don't wait to speak with an attorney
Request a Free Case Review
How MDL 3171 Was Built
The federal Lyft proceeding is new enough that the sequence of orders creating it is still the main story. Nothing has been tried, so what a reader can actually check is the plumbing: who is in charge, how a case gets in, and how fast the docket is filling.- February 2026 · JPML transfer order MDL No. 3171 created in the Northern District of California The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation centralized the federal Lyft passenger sexual assault cases as In re: Lyft, Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation, assigning them to Judge Rita F. Lin. The transfer order centralized an initial group of 17 federal actions that were pending across 10 districts. The panel found the cases shared factual questions about whether Lyft knew of a risk of driver assaults and failed to screen, train, supervise, or respond adequately.
- Spring 2026 · Leadership appointed Co-lead counsel named, two of them Uber MDL veterans Judge Lin appointed three co-lead counsel to run the plaintiffs' side. Two of them also serve as co-leads in the Uber MDL, which means the Lyft proceeding starts with lawyers who have already litigated the same core theories against a rideshare defendant through discovery and trial.
- June 2026 · Pretrial orders on filing mechanics Master complaint, short-form complaint, and direct filing The court approved a master complaint and a template short-form complaint. A new plaintiff fills out the short form, adopts the shared allegations from the master complaint, and adds their own facts, rather than drafting a full standalone complaint. Under the court's direct-filing procedure, a case can be filed straight into the Northern District of California instead of being filed in a home district and waiting for the JPML to transfer it.
- August 3, 2026 · Current JPML count 72 pending, 78 filed to date Up from 54 pending on June 1, 2026. That growth rate is what you would expect once direct filing opens: the administrative friction of joining the MDL drops, and cases that would previously have sat in transfer queues land on the docket directly. The federal count does not include the California state cases.
For readers comparing headlines: MDL No. 3171 is a different case from MDL No. 3084. They are before different judges, on different schedules, at very different stages, and a ruling in one does not bind the other — even though both sit in the same courthouse and involve overlapping plaintiffs' counsel.
Check Potential Eligibility
The California Cases Are Older Than the MDL (JCCP 5061)
The most common misconception about the Lyft litigation is that it started in February 2026. The federal MDL did. The Lyft cases did not.In re Lyft Rideshare Cases, JCCP No. 5061 (case number CJC-20-005061), is a California Judicial Council Coordinated Proceeding in San Francisco County Superior Court. It has been coordinating California state-court Lyft passenger sexual assault cases since 2020 — more than five years before the federal MDL existed — and it is procedurally the more advanced of the two tracks, with discovery and protective orders long since in place. A JCCP is California's state-court analogue to a federal MDL; our JCCP explainer covers the mechanics.
This matters for two practical reasons. First, if you read that Lyft has been facing coordinated assault litigation "for years," that is the state proceeding being described, not the MDL. Second, which track a given case belongs in turns on the facts and on where it can properly be filed — a question for an attorney, not something a reader can settle from a news story.
Why No Lyft Case Has Reached a Jury Yet
As of August 2026, no Lyft passenger sexual assault case has been tried to a jury verdict in either the federal MDL or the California proceeding. That is the single biggest difference between the Lyft and Uber tracks, and it cuts in both directions for anyone weighing a claim.What it means in practice: there is no Lyft verdict to point to, in either direction. No jury has told the parties what these allegations are worth against Lyft, which theories land, or which defenses work. In an MDL, that information usually arrives through bellwether trials — a handful of representative cases tried early so both sides can calibrate. The Uber MDL has been through two federal bellwethers and a state trial; the Lyft MDL has not scheduled a bellwether yet.
Reports have indicated that a first Lyft trial could come out of the California state proceeding, which is far enough along to be trial-ready. No date is stated here: reported dates have varied and trial schedules routinely move, so this page should not be relied on for court scheduling.
The absence of a verdict is not the same as an absence of exposure. It means the Lyft litigation is at an earlier point on the same curve, not that the claims are weaker — and it is worth remembering that the first Uber case to reach a jury, in September 2025, ended without damages, while the next one returned $8.5 million. Early outcomes are a poor predictor of anything.
What the Lyft Lawsuits Allege
The complaints allege that Lyft knew passengers were being sexually assaulted by drivers and did not do enough to prevent it, and that it marketed itself as a safe ride while that was happening. The specific allegations vary by case, but the recurring themes are that Lyft allegedly:• Used driver background screening that did not adequately catch dangerous applicants
• Failed to respond adequately to passenger complaints of sexual misconduct, including repeat complaints about the same driver
• Failed to train or supervise drivers on passenger safety
• Declined to adopt safety design changes to the Lyft app or other standard safety measures
• Told riders it provided safe rides in a way plaintiffs say was misleading given what the company knew
Lyft disputes these allegations and has not been found liable. On the numbers Lyft itself publishes: its safety transparency reporting disclosed 4,158 reports of sexual assault for 2017–2019 and 2,651 for 2020–2022. Those are Lyft's own reported figures, not a court finding, and the reporting categories and ride volumes differ between periods.
Who May Want to Request a Legal Review?
You may want to request a legal review if any of the following happened during a Lyft ride, pickup, or dropoff:• You were sexually assaulted or raped by a Lyft driver
• A driver groped you, touched you inappropriately, or made unwanted physical contact
• A driver kissed you without your consent
• A driver exposed themselves to you
• A driver made sexual comments, threats, or advances
• A driver locked you in, physically restrained you, took you off route, or refused to end the ride
• A driver ended the ride early in the app and then assaulted you
• You were a minor at the time of the incident
Every case depends on the facts, the state where it happened, and any applicable deadline.
You do NOT need:
• A police report — many people never reported to police
• Physical evidence — your account of what happened matters
• Money upfront — the attorneys handling these cases typically work on contingency
Lyft Records That May Help
None of this is required to request a review, but the Lyft app keeps a detailed record of every ride, and these may help:• Your Lyft ride history in the app, which records the driver, the vehicle, the route driven, and the exact start and end times of the ride
• The emailed ride receipt for that trip
• Any report you submitted to Lyft through the app's help or safety flow, and Lyft's reply
• Screenshots and texts you sent to friends or family about what happened, especially anything sent that night
• Reports you made to police, a school, a workplace, a doctor, a therapist, or an advocate
• Medical or therapy records
• Photos, videos, phone location data, or witness names
A ride that was ended early in the app, or a recorded route that does not match where you actually went, can matter. Do not delete Lyft receipts, app records, screenshots, texts, emails, or medical documents if you are considering legal action.
What Compensation Could Cover
Every case is different. What compensation could cover depends on what happened to you, the evidence you have, how it affected your life, and the law of your state:• Medical bills — emergency room visits, doctor's appointments, medications
• Therapy and counseling — past sessions and future treatment
• Lost income — wages you missed because of what happened
• Emotional distress and pain and suffering
• Other damages depending on state law
There is no average and no guaranteed amount, and in the Lyft litigation specifically there is not even a decided verdict to reason from. Anyone quoting you a settlement range for a Lyft claim is estimating, not reporting.
Start a Confidential Review
Is There a Lyft Settlement or Claim Form?
No. No Lyft settlement has been announced, there is no settlement fund, and there is no claim form to submit. If you find a site offering you a "Lyft settlement claim form," treat it with suspicion.These are individual personal-injury claims. An MDL coordinates them for efficiency, but each case is still evaluated on its own facts, evidence, injuries, and applicable state law, and each is resolved individually. That is different from the class action settlements this site usually covers, where everyone in a defined class files the same form for the same type of payment. For how the Lyft and Uber proceedings compare side by side, see our rideshare sexual assault litigation overview.
What Happens Next in the Lyft Litigation
With leadership, a master complaint, a short-form complaint, and direct filing all in place, the federal Lyft proceeding has finished the setup phase. The next milestones an MDL of this shape typically hits are a plaintiff fact-sheet process, general-causation and corporate discovery, and the selection of a bellwether pool for early trials. None of that has been announced on a fixed public schedule here.The California state proceeding runs on its own calendar in San Francisco and is the more likely source of a first Lyft jury verdict, simply because it is five years older. Whatever happens first will shape the rest: the Uber litigation shows how much a single bellwether result can move expectations on both sides, and how little a single result actually settles.
Any broader resolution would depend on trial outcomes across both tracks, the number and strength of the claims, state law, and negotiations between the parties. Nothing about a future settlement is guaranteed, and no date for one has been announced.
How Does This Work? (3 Simple Steps)
• Step 1: Fill out a short form. Click here — you can start a confidential review in about 30 seconds.
• Step 2: Your information may be reviewed. Your information may be reviewed by a legal representative or participating attorney, at no cost and with no obligation.
• Step 3: If an attorney accepts your case, they handle the legal process. Attorneys handling these cases typically work on contingency, meaning fees come out of any recovery rather than your pocket. You are free to choose any attorney you wish, and you are never required to hire anyone this site connects you with.
Important: A review is not guaranteed, and submitting the form does not stop any legal deadline. If you do not hear back promptly, do not wait — contact a qualified attorney of your choosing directly, because time limits may be running.
Common Questions
How many Lyft sexual assault lawsuits are pending?
The JPML's statistics report dated August 3, 2026 lists 72 actions pending in MDL No. 3171, out of 78 total actions filed to date, up from 54 pending on June 1, 2026. A separate and much older group of Lyft cases has been coordinated in California state court since 2020 under JCCP No. 5061, and those are counted separately. MDL counts change month to month.
Has any Lyft sexual assault case gone to trial?
No. As of August 2026 no Lyft passenger sexual assault case had reached a jury verdict in either track. Reports have indicated a first Lyft trial could come out of the California state proceeding, but trial schedules routinely move and no date should be relied on from this page.
When was the Lyft MDL created and who is the judge?
The JPML centralized the federal Lyft cases in February 2026, creating MDL No. 3171, In re: Lyft, Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California before Judge Rita F. Lin. The transfer order centralized an initial group of 17 federal actions pending across 10 districts.
What is the difference between the Lyft MDL and the California Lyft cases?
MDL No. 3171 is the federal proceeding, created in February 2026 before Judge Rita F. Lin. In re Lyft Rideshare Cases, JCCP No. 5061, is a separate California state-court coordinated proceeding in San Francisco County Superior Court that has been running since 2020 and is further along. Which track a case belongs in depends on the facts and on where it was filed.
What is a short-form complaint and why does it matter?
In June 2026 the court approved a template short-form complaint for MDL No. 3171. A plaintiff completes that short form, adopts the shared factual allegations from the master complaint, and adds their own facts, rather than drafting a full standalone complaint. Combined with direct filing, which lets a new case be filed straight into the Northern District of California rather than waiting for a transfer, it makes joining the Lyft MDL administratively faster.
Do I need a police report?
No. A police report can help, but it is not required, and many of the people currently suing never filed one. Lyft ride history, ride receipts, in-app reports, contemporaneous messages, and medical or therapy records may all be useful instead.
What if my Lyft ride was years ago?
You may still be able to pursue a claim. Every state sets its own time limit, and that limit can depend on the date of the incident and the survivor's age at the time. Only a qualified attorney can tell you whether you are still within the window that applies to you.
What if I was assaulted by an Uber driver instead?
That is a separate and much larger litigation, coordinated in MDL No. 3084 before a different judge, with its own California state proceeding and three decided trials. This page covers Lyft only. See our Uber sexual assault lawsuit page for that track.
Will my name be public?
In many cases, survivors can proceed under a pseudonym to protect their privacy. An attorney can explain how this works in your situation.
Does submitting this form stop the statute of limitations?
No. Submitting a form on this page does not file a lawsuit, preserve a claim, toll a statute of limitations, or extend any deadline, and it does not guarantee that an attorney will review or respond to your case. Only a qualified attorney can advise you about deadlines that may apply to you.
Do I have to use the attorneys from this page?
No. You can hire any attorney you choose. You are never required to use this site or any attorney it connects you with. OpenClassActions.com is an attorney-advertising and informational resource, not a law firm, and it does not recommend or endorse any particular lawyer. Because deadlines may be running, contacting a qualified attorney promptly is a good idea.
Request a Free Case Review
Free settlement alerts
Get notified when new class actions open to claims
Join thousands of readers who get the latest class action settlements you may qualify for — delivered straight to your inbox.
Important Legal Notice
IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE: OpenClassActions.com is an attorney-advertising and informational resource — it is not a law firm, does not provide legal advice, and does not recommend or endorse any particular lawyer or law firm. It may be compensated when you connect with a participating attorney. Submitting information through this page does not create an attorney-client relationship, does not mean any attorney has agreed to represent you, does not file a lawsuit for you, and does not stop, pause, or extend any legal deadline. Time limits may apply to Lyft, rideshare sexual assault, sexual abuse, and personal injury claims. These deadlines can vary by state and may depend on the date of the incident, the survivor's age at the time, and other facts. You are free to choose any attorney you wish and are never required to use anyone this site connects you with. If you do not receive a response from an attorney, or if you believe any deadline may be approaching, do not wait. You should contact a qualified attorney of your choosing directly as soon as possible to protect your rights.
Sources
• JPML — Pending MDLs statistics reports (August 3, 2026)• JPML — MDL No. 3171 Transfer Order
• GovInfo — In re: Lyft, Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation (JPML order)
• California Courts — Civil Case Coordination (JCCP proceedings, incl. No. 5061)
• Daily Journal — Lyft Sexual Assault Cases Consolidated (Feb. 2026)
• Daily Journal — Judge Appoints Leadership in the Lyft MDL
• Lyft — Safety Transparency Report
• RAINN — Sexual Violence Statistics
ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT. DOES NOT CONSTITUTE MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.
Information on OpenClassActions.com is for general informational and advertising purposes only and is not legal advice or medical advice. No attorney-client relationship between reader and any OpenClassActions.com partners or law firms is created by reading this page or submitting any forms. Submitting a form does not guarantee attorney review, attorney response, representation, the filing of a lawsuit, a settlement, or compensation. Upon submitting any forms on this or partner sites, you agree that a legal representative or a partner firm may contact you. Readers should speak directly with a qualified attorney about their own legal rights and deadlines.
For more class actions keep scrolling below.
Status
MDL and JCCP pending — no settlement, no trial yet
Federal Case
In re: Lyft, Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation
Federal MDL
MDL No. 3171 — Judge Rita F. Lin
Federal Court
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
MDL Created
February 2026 — 17 initial actions from 10 districts
California Case
In re Lyft Rideshare Cases — JCCP No. 5061 (CJC-20-005061)
California Court
San Francisco County Superior Court — coordinated since 2020
Pending Federal Actions
72 (JPML report dated August 3, 2026)
Official Website
JPML Pending MDLs
