Investors who bought Bloom Energy (NYSE: BE) securities between February 27, 2025 and July 8, 2026 may be covered by a proposed class action alleging Bloom Energy misled the market about its reliance on scandium from China. No class has been certified and there is nothing to file yet.
Allegations Only · No Settlement Yet
This article describes a class action complaint. The statements below are unproven allegations. Bloom Energy and the individual defendants have not been found liable, there is no certified class, and nothing to claim at this time. This page is informational and is not legal advice.
What Is This About?
A Bloom Energy shareholder filed a proposed securities class action on July 30, 2026 against the San Jose, California fuel-cell maker and four of its executives. The case, Nevins v. Bloom Energy Corporation, No. 3:26-cv-07944, is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California before Judge Rita F. Lin.The complaint alleges that Bloom Energy repeatedly told investors it did not depend on China for its supply chain, and specifically not for scandium, while it was obtaining Chinese scandium through intermediaries in other countries. It seeks damages under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for investors who bought during the class period. The case is at its earliest stage: no lead plaintiff has been appointed and the defendants have not responded.
Free settlement alerts
Get notified when new class actions open to claims
Join thousands of readers who get the latest class action settlements you may qualify for — delivered straight to your inbox.
What the Complaint Alleges
Bloom Energy designs, makes and installs solid oxide fuel cell systems that generate power on site. According to the complaint, the fuel cells rely on scandium, a rare earth metal used to stabilize their zirconia-based ceramic electrolyte. The complaint cites a fuel-cell researcher's view that scandium purification happens primarily in China, and notes that China tightened rare earth export controls in 2025, so where Bloom sources the metal bears on its exposure to Chinese trade policy.The complaint lists a series of statements from February 2025 through July 2026 in which Bloom and its chief executive described a supply chain without meaningful exposure to China. Among them, it quotes CEO KR Sridhar telling analysts on the April 30, 2025 earnings call that "we are not dependent on China for scandium," and cites annual and quarterly reports stating the company's "supply chain does not have significant exposure to China." It also points to a July 7, 2026 company blog post describing a diversified scandium sourcing network across multiple countries.
The plaintiff alleges those statements were misleading because Bloom obtained scandium through intermediaries that sourced it from China, and so understated how much it relied on Chinese scandium.
The July 8, 2026 Report and Stock Drop
The class period ends on July 8, 2026, when Hunterbrook Media published a report alleging that Bloom was reliant on Chinese scandium. As summarized in the complaint, the report said it had traced four China-linked supply routes: scandium oxide shipped directly from a Chinese producer to Bloom's Delaware plant in 2023 and 2024, and scandium-bearing ceramics and powders reaching Bloom through suppliers in Thailand, Japan and South Korea. The report also quoted a sales representative of a Chinese scandium producer describing the company as Bloom's largest scandium supplier. These are claims made by a publication and repeated in a lawsuit; they have not been tested in court.According to the complaint, Bloom's stock fell $15.28, or 5.7%, to close at $254.29 that day on unusually heavy volume. The complaint says the shares had closed at a class-period high of $345.85 on June 22, 2026.
Who the Defendants Are
The complaint names Bloom Energy Corporation and four current or former executives: Chief Executive Officer KR Sridhar; Simon Edwards, chief financial officer since April 13, 2026; Maciej Kurzymski, acting principal financial officer from May 2, 2025 to April 12, 2026; and Daniel Berenbaum, chief financial officer from April 29, 2024 to May 1, 2025. The executives are sued as controlling persons under Section 20(a) as well as under Section 10(b). None has been found liable.Who Is Covered
The proposed class is every person and entity that bought or otherwise acquired Bloom Energy securities from February 27, 2025 through July 8, 2026, inclusive, and was damaged. The defendants, Bloom's officers and directors, their immediate families and entities they control are excluded. The court has not certified the class.Investors in the class period do not need to do anything now to stay in the proposed class. If the case ever produces a settlement or judgment, class members would receive a notice and would typically file a claim with brokerage records showing their purchases and sales.
What Happens Next
Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, the plaintiff's lawyers published notice of the case on July 31, 2026, opening a window for investors to ask the court to appoint them lead plaintiff. That window closes September 28, 2026. The court then picks a lead plaintiff, usually the applicant with the largest losses, and approves its choice of lead counsel.The court's initial scheduling order set a case management statement for October 21, 2026 and an initial case management conference for October 28, 2026. In securities cases those dates often move once a lead plaintiff is appointed. The lead plaintiff typically files an amended complaint, and the defendants usually move to dismiss it. Discovery generally does not begin until the court rules on that motion.
Not the 2024 Bloom Energy Settlement
Bloom Energy investors have been paid once before, in an unrelated case. In May 2024, the same federal court gave final approval to a $3 million settlement of claims over Bloom's July 2018 initial public offering, covering investors who bought from the IPO through March 31, 2020. That settlement's claim deadline passed on March 29, 2024, and the case is closed. It has no connection to the scandium allegations.Read the Complaint
The class action complaint filed July 30, 2026 lays out every statement the plaintiff challenges and the report excerpts it relies on.Questions
Is there a Bloom Energy settlement I can file a claim for?
No. The 2026 Bloom Energy securities case is at the complaint stage, with no settlement, no settlement website and no claim form. The only past Bloom Energy investor settlement, a $3 million deal over the company's 2018 IPO, closed to claims on March 29, 2024.
What does the September 28, 2026 deadline mean?
It is the deadline for investors to ask the court to appoint them lead plaintiff, the class member who directs the case on behalf of everyone else. It is not a claim deadline. Investors who bought Bloom Energy securities during the class period do not have to do anything by that date to remain part of the proposed class.
Who is covered by the Bloom Energy class action?
The proposed class is every person and entity that bought or otherwise acquired Bloom Energy (NYSE: BE) securities from February 27, 2025 through July 8, 2026 and was damaged, excluding the defendants, company officers and directors, and their families. The court has not certified the class.
What is scandium and why does it matter to Bloom Energy?
Scandium is a rare earth metal. According to the complaint, Bloom Energy uses scandium oxide to stabilize the zirconia-based ceramic electrolyte in its solid oxide fuel cells, so the source of that supply bears on the company's exposure to Chinese export controls on rare earths.
Has Bloom Energy responded to the lawsuit?
Not in court yet. As of the last docket entry, summonses had been issued on August 3, 2026, and no response from Bloom Energy or the individual defendants had been filed. The allegations have not been proven, and the defendants have not been found liable.
Sources
• Class Action Complaint, Nevins v. Bloom Energy Corporation, No. 3:26-cv-07944 (N.D. Cal.), filed July 30, 2026 (PDF).• Docket, Nevins v. Bloom Energy Corporation — CourtListener/RECAP, including the August 3, 2026 case assignment and initial case management scheduling order.
• Docket, Roberts v. Bloom Energy Corporation, No. 4:19-cv-02935 (N.D. Cal.) — the closed 2018 IPO case.
• Bloomberg Law — Bloom Energy gets $3 million class settlement over IPO finalized.
