People charged a $20 “Processing Fee” when paying COBRA premiums or related FSA and HSA amounts through Optum Financial’s online portal may be covered by a proposed class action alleging Optum Financial and its subsidiary ConnectYourCare imposed an undisclosed junk fee. No class has been certified and there is nothing to file yet.
Allegations Only · No Settlement Yet
This article describes a class action complaint. The statements below are unproven allegations. Optum Financial, Inc. and ConnectYourCare, LLC have not been found liable, there is no certified class, and nothing to claim at this time. This page is informational and is not legal advice.
What Is the Optum COBRA Processing Fee Lawsuit?
A San Francisco resident who pays for COBRA coverage through Optum filed a proposed class action on October 14, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Case No. 3:26-cv-11895. The defendants are Optum Financial, Inc. and its subsidiary ConnectYourCare, LLC, which the complaint describes as a third-party administrator running an online platform where people manage and pay for COBRA continuation coverage and related flexible spending account (FSA) and health savings account (HSA) payments.The complaint alleges that Optum adds a flat $20.00 “Processing Fee” to every one-time monthly payment made through that portal, whatever the payment method or amount, and that it does not adequately disclose the fee before checkout. The plaintiff calls it a junk fee that is not tied to any real processing cost. The case is at the complaint stage. Optum had not responded in court as of October 15, 2026, and no judge has ruled on any of the allegations.
Free settlement alerts
Get notified when new class actions open to claims
Join thousands of readers who get the latest class action settlements you may qualify for — delivered straight to your inbox.
COBRA and Optum’s Role, as the Complaint Describes It
COBRA, short for the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, is the federal law that lets workers and their families temporarily keep their employer’s group health coverage after events such as a job loss, a cut in hours, the death of the covered employee, divorce or legal separation. The complaint says continuation coverage can last 18 or 36 months depending on the reason, and that the former employee usually pays the whole premium. Citing a financial-services publication, it puts average COBRA premiums at more than $700 a month for individual coverage and more than $2,000 a month for family coverage.Employers often hire an outside administrator to handle COBRA notices, elections and premium collection. According to the complaint, Optum is one of them: it says Optum administers COBRA for employers and also collects payments from former employees who keep contributing to an FSA or HSA while on COBRA. Citing UnitedHealth Group investor materials, the complaint says Optum serves as administrator for more than 58,000 employers. When an employer uses Optum, the complaint says, former employees pay Optum directly through its online COBRA portal; the plaintiff says he could not choose a different administrator.
What the Complaint Alleges About the $20 Fee
The plaintiff’s central allegation is that Optum charges a uniform $20.00 fee on each one-time monthly payment made online, whether the person pays by ACH bank transfer, debit card or credit card, and regardless of how large the payment is. The complaint makes these further allegations:- Optum does not adequately tell people about the fee during COBRA sign-up or the payment process, and the fee is added only at checkout.
- The fee is presented as mandatory, and Optum does not explain any other way to pay that would avoid it.
- The portal does not accept several months’ premiums in one payment, so a person paying six months at once would make six separate payments and owe $120 in fees.
- No additional processing is actually performed, because employers already pay Optum for its administration services.
- Labeling the charge a “Processing Fee” obscures its nature, and Optum does not explain what the fee is for.
The complaint ties the fee to a broader policy debate over junk fees, quoting a March 2024 White House economic report and an October 2023 Federal Trade Commission announcement about hidden fees. It also points to an amendment to California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act that bars advertising a price that leaves out mandatory fees, a practice known as drip pricing.
The named plaintiff enrolled in COBRA in April 2025 for medical and dental coverage and to keep contributing to an FSA. According to the complaint, the three amounts totaled $924.59 a month. On May 5, 2026, he paid through Optum’s portal by ACH transfer and was charged $944.59, which the complaint says included the $20.00 fee. He says he did not know about the fee before reaching the payment portal and believed he had to pay it to keep his coverage.
The COBRA 2% Administrative Charge Argument
The complaint also argues that the fee runs into a federal limit on COBRA pricing. As the complaint describes it, a plan can charge a COBRA participant no more than the cost of coverage plus a 2% administrative charge, or 102% in total. Its own example: on a $700 monthly premium, the administrative charge could be no more than $14, for a total of $714.The plaintiff alleges that Optum’s $20 fee is charged on top of that 2% amount and pays for the same administration that the 2% already covers. Optum has not yet answered that argument, and how the 102% limit applies to a separate online payment fee is a question for the court.
Who Is in the Proposed Classes?
The complaint proposes two classes, each covering the fullest period the law allows. “Health Care Benefits” in both definitions means COBRA coverage, FSAs and HSAs.- Nationwide Class: all persons in the United States who were charged the fee by Optum in connection with Health Care Benefits.
- California Class: all persons who were charged the fee by Optum in connection with Health Care Benefits while living in California.
There is no separate Minnesota class; Minnesota law is invoked on behalf of the nationwide class. The presiding judge and family members, Optum and its affiliates and their current and former employees, officers and directors, both sides’ lawyers, people who opt out, and people whose claims have already been decided or released are excluded. These are proposals only. The court has not certified either class, and the plaintiff reserved the right to change the definitions or add subclasses.
Legal Claims and What the Suit Asks For
The complaint brings four claims:- violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law, on behalf of the California Class;
- violation of California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act, on behalf of the California Class;
- unjust enrichment and quasi-contract, on behalf of the Nationwide Class; and
- violation of the Minnesota Prevention of Consumer Fraud Act, on behalf of the Nationwide Class.
The Minnesota claim rests on two points in the complaint: the Terms of Use for Optum Financial’s websites select Minnesota law, and Optum Financial is headquartered in Eden Prairie, Minnesota, where the plaintiff alleges the fee decisions were made. The complaint adds that the plaintiff does not concede those Terms of Use are enforceable.
The plaintiff asks the court to certify the classes and to award actual, compensatory, statutory, treble and punitive damages and restitution as the law permits, disgorgement of profits, interest, and attorneys’ fees and costs. The complaint also seeks declaratory relief and an injunction, including a public injunction, to stop the fee practices it describes. On the California consumer claim, it currently seeks only an injunction: it says the plaintiff’s lawyers sent Optum the pre-suit notice letter that statute requires and plan to amend the complaint to add damages if Optum does not address the problems within 30 days. No dollar figure is stated beyond the more than $5 million needed for federal jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act. The plaintiff demands a jury trial.
What Happens Next
The case was filed October 14, 2026. Optum Financial and ConnectYourCare had not filed a response as of October 15, 2026. A defendant in a case like this ordinarily answers the complaint or moves to dismiss it, and any decision on class certification would come later.There is no settlement and no claim form. If the case settles or a class is certified, class members would normally receive notice describing any process, and the case would appear in our settlements listing.
Questions
Is there an Optum COBRA processing fee settlement?
There is no settlement. The case was filed October 14, 2026, and is at the complaint stage: no class has been certified, no money has been awarded and there is no claim form. Any recovery would depend on the plaintiff winning the case or the parties reaching a settlement that the court approves.
Who is in the proposed classes in the Optum lawsuit?
The complaint proposes a Nationwide Class of everyone in the United States who was charged the $20 fee by Optum in connection with COBRA coverage, an FSA or an HSA, and a California Class of people charged the fee while living in California. Both reach back as far as the law allows. There is no separate Minnesota class. The court has not certified either class, and the plaintiff can ask to change the definitions.
Why does the complaint say the $20 fee conflicts with COBRA’s 2% limit?
The complaint says federal law caps what a COBRA participant can be charged at the cost of coverage plus a 2% administrative charge, or 102% in total. Using its own example, a $700 monthly premium would allow at most a $14 administrative charge. The plaintiff argues the flat $20 fee is charged on top of that limit for administration that is already paid for. Optum has not responded in court, and no judge has ruled on the argument.
Why does a lawsuit filed in California rely on Minnesota law?
According to the complaint, the Terms of Use for Optum Financial’s websites choose Minnesota law, and Optum Financial is headquartered in Eden Prairie, Minnesota, where the plaintiff alleges decisions about the fee were made. The complaint uses that to bring a Minnesota consumer fraud claim for the nationwide class, while saying the plaintiff does not concede the Terms of Use are enforceable. The two California statutes are pleaded for the California Class only.
How are Optum Financial and ConnectYourCare related?
The complaint describes ConnectYourCare, LLC as a Maryland company wholly owned by Optum Financial, Inc., a Delaware corporation based in Eden Prairie, Minnesota. It says the two work together as a third-party administrator offering an online platform for managing COBRA benefits, and it refers to them jointly as Optum. The complaint identifies UnitedHealth Group as Optum’s parent company.
Sources
• Class Action Complaint, No. 3:26-cv-11895 (N.D. Cal., filed Oct. 14, 2026), via CourtListener.• Docket, No. 3:26-cv-11895 (N.D. Cal.), CourtListener.
