Published
July 6, 2026
New Mexico became the first state to take a Big Tech child-safety case to a jury and win — a $375 million verdict against Meta. It is a landmark, but it is not money for individual users, and Meta says it will appeal.
What Happened?
On March 24, 2026, a New Mexico jury ordered Meta to pay $375 million after finding the company violated the state's consumer-protection law by failing to protect children on Facebook and Instagram. With the verdict, New Mexico became the first state to prevail at trial in the growing wave of litigation accusing major technology companies of endangering young users.The case was brought by the New Mexico Attorney General as a government enforcement action — not a private class action — and it went the distance: after a roughly seven-week trial, the jury sided with the state. Meta has said its apps are safe for young people and that it intends to appeal.
Verdict
$375 million against Meta
Jury verdict March 24, 2026 · State of New Mexico v. Meta Platforms · New Mexico state court
Finding
Meta violated New Mexico consumer-protection law by failing to protect children on Facebook & Instagram
First state to win a social-media child-safety case at trial
Can I Claim?
No — this is a state enforcement case
Not a consumer class action · no claim form or fund for individuals · Meta says it will appeal
Why This Verdict Is a Landmark
State attorneys general and private plaintiffs have filed a wave of cases arguing that social-media platforms are designed in ways that harm children — through addictive engagement mechanics, exposure to harmful content, and inadequate safeguards. Most of those cases have been fought over motions and settlements; very few have reached a jury. New Mexico's win makes it the first state to take such a case to trial and prevail, which is why the outcome is being watched closely by other states, plaintiffs, and the companies themselves.A verdict like this can shape leverage well beyond a single state. It signals to other attorneys general that a jury is willing to hold a platform accountable under consumer-protection law, and it can influence how similar cases are valued in settlement talks.
The Evidence at Trial
During the trial, New Mexico pointed to internal Meta communications to argue the company understood the risks to children and did not do enough. Among the material discussed were internal messages about how a plan to make Messenger end-to-end encrypted by default could affect the company's ability to detect and report child sexual abuse material to law enforcement. New Mexico argued this reflected a company weighing product decisions against child-safety obligations; Meta disputes that characterization and maintains its apps are safe and that it invests heavily in protecting young users. These competing interpretations are part of what an appeal may revisit.What Comes Next
The $375 million figure is a jury verdict, not a final, un-appealable judgment. Meta has said it will appeal, and verdicts of this size are frequently the subject of post-trial motions and appellate review that can reduce, reverse, or otherwise alter the outcome.The damages verdict was also not the end of the case. A separate phase was set to address New Mexico's public-nuisance claims and the state's request that the court order changes to Meta's platforms — including more effective age verification. Those forward-looking remedies, if granted, could ultimately matter as much as the dollar figure, because they go to how the platforms operate.
What It Means for Consumers
It is important to be clear about what this verdict is and isn't for everyday users. Because this is a state enforcement action, there is no consumer claim form and no fund for individuals to file against in this case. If you are a parent concerned about a child's experience on social media, this verdict does not create a payment for you.Separately, there is a large body of private litigation over social-media harms to minors — including the consolidated social media addiction lawsuits and Instagram addiction claims for minors — which are different cases with their own procedures. OCA has also covered the broader social-media verdict landscape and what it may mean for future lawsuits and settlements.
Frequently Asked Questions
What did the jury decide?
On March 24, 2026, a New Mexico jury ordered Meta to pay $375 million, finding it violated state consumer-protection law by failing to protect children on Facebook and Instagram. Meta says it will appeal.Can I claim money from this?
No. This is a state enforcement lawsuit, not a consumer class action. There is no claim form or fund for individuals in this case.Is the $375 million final?
Not necessarily. Meta has said it will appeal, and large verdicts are often changed on post-trial motions or appeal. A separate phase addressing platform changes like age verification was set to follow.Sources
• CNBC — "Meta must pay $375 million for violating New Mexico law in child exploitation case, jury rules": CNBC• CNBC — "Meta's public nuisance case in New Mexico has billion-dollar consequences": CNBC
• New Mexico Department of Justice (Office of the Attorney General) — official site: New Mexico DOJ
Free settlement alerts
Get notified when new class actions open to claims
Join thousands of readers who get the latest class action settlements you may qualify for — delivered straight to your inbox.
For more class actions keep scrolling below.
Status
Jury Verdict — Meta Says It Will Appeal
Case Title
State of New Mexico v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
Court
New Mexico state court
Verdict Date
March 24, 2026
Amount
$375 million
