People who bought contact lenses from Lens.com may be affected by a lawsuit the Federal Trade Commission and the attorneys general of Utah and Nevada filed on October 2, 2026, alleging Lens.com added hidden “Taxes & fees” at checkout that routinely doubled advertised prices. The case is at the complaint stage, and there is no refund or claim process yet.
Allegations Only · No Settlement Yet
This article describes a government lawsuit. The statements below are unproven allegations. Lens.com, its owner and Speed Commerce have not been found liable, the court has not ruled, and there is no refund or claim process. This page is informational and is not legal advice.
What Is the Lens.com Lawsuit?
On October 2, 2026, the Federal Trade Commission, joined by the attorneys general of Utah and Nevada, sued online contact lens seller Lens.com Inc., its owner Cary Samourkachian, and an affiliated company, Speed Commerce LLC, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada. The complaint says Lens.com advertised low prices for contact lenses, then charged much more at checkout through a mandatory “Taxes & fees” line that, according to the FTC, routinely doubled the advertised price.“Lens.com advertised one price for contact lenses but charged a substantially higher price at checkout, deceiving consumers about the cost of this healthcare necessity,” said Christopher Mufarrige, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. The Commission voted 2-0 to file the case. As the FTC notes, it files a complaint when it has reason to believe the law is being violated, and the case will be decided by the court.
Free settlement alerts
Get notified when new class actions open to claims
Join thousands of readers who get the latest class action settlements you may qualify for — delivered straight to your inbox.
What the Complaint Alleges
According to the FTC’s announcement, the complaint makes these claims:- Low advertised prices. Lens.com advertised artificially low prices for contact lenses in Google search ads and on its own website.
- A mandatory “Taxes & fees” charge. At checkout it added a required charge labeled “Taxes & fees” that routinely doubled the advertised price.
- Hidden placement. The “Taxes & fees” line appeared below the visible part of the checkout screen, so shoppers could miss it.
- A misleading label. Many states exempt contact lenses from sales tax, so calling the charge “Taxes & fees” suggested a government charge when much of it was not, the agencies say.
- AutoRefill. Lens.com used the low advertised prices to sign customers up for its AutoRefill subscription without clearly disclosing the extra fees first, and did not clearly disclose how to cancel or the deadline to do so.
Who Could Be Affected
The case concerns people who bought contact lenses from Lens.com after seeing an advertised price, and people enrolled in its AutoRefill program. The FTC’s announcement does not give a time period, a number of customers or a dollar figure for the alleged overcharges. Utah and Nevada joined the case, but the FTC’s claims are not limited to those two states.OCA has covered the same kind of drip-pricing complaint against other sellers, including the Raging Waters ticket fee settlement and the FTD and ProFlowers delivery fee settlement, both of which are taking claims.
Is There a Refund?
Not yet. The FTC has filed a complaint, not reached a settlement, so there is no refund program or claim form. In some FTC cases, a court order or settlement later provides money that the agency sends to affected customers, usually by check or electronic payment, without a claim form. Whether that happens here depends on how the case ends.The FTC does not charge anyone to receive a refund and does not ask for bank account logins. Any message claiming to offer a Lens.com refund today is not from this case.
What Happens Next
Lens.com and the other defendants will respond to the complaint in the Nevada federal court. The case could end in a settlement with an order that changes how Lens.com shows prices and handles AutoRefill, and possibly provides money for customers, or it could be litigated. No court date has been announced. OCA will update this page if the case settles or the FTC announces a refund program.Questions
What is the Lens.com lawsuit about?
The FTC and the Utah and Nevada attorneys general allege that Lens.com advertised low contact lens prices in Google search ads and on its website, then added a mandatory “Taxes & fees” charge at checkout that routinely doubled the advertised price, placed that line below the visible part of the checkout screen, and enrolled customers in AutoRefill without clearly disclosing the fees or how to cancel. Lens.com has not been found liable.
Can I get a refund from Lens.com?
Not through this case yet. The FTC filed a complaint on October 2, 2026, and the court has not ruled. There is no settlement, refund program or claim form. In some FTC cases the agency later sends refunds to affected customers, but that only happens if the case ends in a settlement or court order that provides for it.
Why does the complaint say the “Taxes & fees” label was misleading?
According to the FTC, the charge was labeled “Taxes & fees” even though many states exempt contact lenses from sales tax, so the label suggested a government charge when much of it was not. That is the agencies’ allegation; The court has not decided the claim.
Who is being sued?
Lens.com Inc., its owner Cary Samourkachian, and an affiliated company, Speed Commerce LLC. The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada. The FTC voted 2-0 to file it.
What laws does the complaint say Lens.com broke?
The complaint alleges violations of the FTC Act, the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act (which covers online subscriptions and cancellation), the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Utah’s Consumer Sales Practices Act and Automatic Renewal Contracts Act, and Nevada’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act. These are allegations that the court will decide.
Sources
• Federal Trade Commission — FTC, states sue Lens.com for misrepresenting the price of contact lenses in search ads and on its website (October 2, 2026)OpenClassActions.com is a consumer news site; it is not a law firm and is not affiliated with any party. It is not legal advice.
