Claims are open and the window is about to shut. The deadline to file is August 27, 2026. The deadline to
exclude yourself was August 12, 2026 and has passed, so anyone still in the class is bound by the release
whether or not they claim. The Court has set the final approval hearing for September 11, 2026, and the
settlement has not been approved yet. No payment date has been announced.
Status
Claims Open
closing immediately · final approval hearing September 11, 2026
Claim Deadline
August 27, 2026
online or by mail · the deadline to opt out passed on August 12
Estimated Payout
Pro rata cash, or up to $3,500
$980,000 fund across roughly 152,000 people · documented losses and lost time share one ceiling · two years of monitoring alongside either
Proof Required
Yes
the online claim form opens on a login screen keyed to your notice · documentation on top for the $3,500 tier
The claim window is at its end. Berman & Rabin, P.A. has agreed to a $980,000 settlement resolving
Burton, et al. v. Berman & Rabin, P.A., Case No. 2:25-cv-02051-DDC-GEB, in the United States
District Court for the District of Kansas, docketed as In re Berman & Rabin Data Breach
Litigation. Notice has gone out, the opt-out window closed on August 12, 2026, and the claim portal
remains live on the official settlement website until August 27.
Berman & Rabin denies the allegations, and no court has found that the firm did anything wrong. The
parties agreed to settle rather than continue litigating.
Berman & Rabin, P.A. is a law firm based in Overland Park, Kansas, whose practice includes creditors'
rights and collections work.
That business model is the reason this breach reaches so many people who have never heard of the firm. A
collections practice holds files on the consumers whose accounts it has been retained to pursue, so the
people whose information sits in its systems are largely not its clients — their data arrived with a file
they had no say over.
According to the settlement, a cyberattack on the firm's computer system in July 2024 compromised private
information. Security trade reporting has put the number of people affected at about 152,000.
The lawsuit alleged that the firm failed to adequately protect the information in its systems. Those are
allegations; the Court has made no finding of wrongdoing and the firm denies it.
The Settlement Class covers living individuals residing in the United States whose private information was
compromised in the July 2024 cyberattack on Berman & Rabin's computer system, including everyone who
received notice of the data incident.
The class is nationwide rather than Kansas-only. Membership turns on whether your information was caught up
in the attack, not on any relationship with the firm — which is why the notice you were sent is the
practical marker of who is in, and why a notice from a law firm you do not recognize is not by itself a red
flag here. Verify any message about the settlement against the official settlement website before acting on
it.
The $980,000 fund pays out along these lines:
- Reimbursement of up to $3,500 for documented out-of-pocket losses and lost time caused by the breach. Both share that single ceiling rather than having separate allowances.
- A pro rata cash payment for class members without documented losses, calculated by dividing what remains of the fund among the valid claims.
- Two years of CyEx Financial Shield Complete credit monitoring, which the settlement describes as including $1 million in fraud insurance.
The pro rata figure is worth doing the arithmetic on before you decide which route to take. $980,000 spread
across roughly 152,000 notified people is about $6.45 a head before a single deduction. Out of that fund
come up to $326,634 in attorneys' fees, $10,000 in service awards for the class representatives, the cost of
notice and administration, every documented-loss claim, and two years of monitoring for everyone who elects
it. What is left is what gets divided.
In practice pro rata payments in settlements like this one land well above that per-capita number, because
only a small fraction of a class ever files — but the direction of the uncertainty is the point. The
documented tier has a fixed $3,500 ceiling that does not shrink because other people filed. Anyone who
absorbed a fraudulent charge, paid for monitoring out of pocket after the notice arrived, or spent money
replacing identification should assemble that paperwork rather than defaulting to the cash.
Proof is required to file. The online claim form on the official settlement website opens on a login screen
rather than an open form, which means filing online depends on the credentials printed on the notice the
administrator sent you. An administrator-issued identifier counts as proof in its own right, because someone
who never received the notice cannot supply it — and that holds even for the pro rata cash payment, which
requires no receipts of its own.
The $3,500 tier requires documentation on top of that, tied to this incident: statements showing the
fraudulent activity, invoices for a monitoring service you bought yourself, records of what replacing
identification cost. Lost time is normally described rather than receipted, at a stated rate and a capped
number of hours, and counts against the same ceiling. Anything already reimbursed by a bank, insurer or
employer cannot be claimed again.
If you hold a notice but cannot find the credentials, use the contact route on the official settlement
website immediately — with the deadline this close there is no margin.
August 27, 2026, online or by mail. The published materials give the date without specifying a cut-off time
or a timezone, so treat the date itself as the deadline, and file online rather than trusting a postmark at
this range.
The deadline to exclude yourself passed on August 12, 2026. Anyone who did not opt out by then is in the
class and will be bound by the release if the settlement is approved, whether or not they file. That is the
practical case for filing: the release costs you the right to sue over this incident either way, so not
claiming means giving it up for nothing.
File on the official settlement website,
Berman Rabin Settlement,
which is the only court-authorized site for this case. Have the notice in front of you for the login
credentials, decide between the documented tier and the pro rata cash before you begin, and elect the credit
monitoring in the same sitting.
If you are claiming documented losses, upload the records with the form. A documented claim filed without
documentation is the most common reason this kind of claim pays nothing.
The next milestone is the final approval hearing on September 11, 2026, where the Court will consider
whether to approve the settlement and rule on the requested attorneys' fees of up to $326,634 and the
$10,000 in service awards. Hearing dates can move without further notice being mailed.
A hearing being held is not the same as approval being granted, and approval is not the same as payments
being released. No payment date has been announced. We will update this page when the Court rules and again
if a distribution date is published.
Why would a debt collection law firm have my information?
Berman & Rabin, P.A. is a Kansas law firm whose practice includes creditors' rights and
collections work. A firm in that line holds files on the consumers whose accounts it is retained to
pursue, which is why the people affected by a breach there are largely not the firm's own clients.
Most class members never chose to hand the firm anything — their information arrived with a file.
That is also why a notice from a law firm you have never heard of is not necessarily a scam, though
it is worth verifying against the official settlement website before acting on any message about
it.
What will the pro rata cash payment actually be worth?
No fixed figure is attached to it, and the arithmetic is not encouraging. The fund is $980,000, and
reporting has put the number of people affected at about 152,000. Out of that fund come up to
$326,634 in attorneys' fees, $10,000 in service awards, the cost of notice and administration, the
documented-loss claims and two years of credit monitoring for everyone who elects it. Whatever is
left is divided among the people who claimed cash, so the per-person amount depends entirely on how
many file. Anyone with documentable losses should price the documented tier first.
Does the $3,500 cover lost time as well as out-of-pocket costs?
The settlement describes reimbursement of up to $3,500 for documented out-of-pocket losses and lost
time, which puts both under the same ceiling rather than giving lost time a separate allowance the
way some settlements do. Documented out-of-pocket costs typically include identity theft losses,
credit monitoring you paid for yourself, and the cost of replacing identification. Lost time
normally has to be described rather than receipted, at a stated hourly rate and a capped number of
hours. The Claim Form sets out how the two are counted against the ceiling.
The opt-out deadline has already passed. What does that mean for me?
The deadline to exclude yourself was August 12, 2026. If you did not opt out by then, you are in the
class and will be bound by the release if the Court approves the settlement, whether or not you file
a claim. That is the practical reason to file: the release costs you the right to sue over this
incident either way, so declining to claim means giving that up for nothing. The claim deadline of
August 27, 2026 is the last decision still open to you.
Has the settlement been approved, and when would money go out?
It has not been approved. The final approval hearing is scheduled for September 11, 2026, where the
Court will consider whether the settlement is fair and rule on the fee and service award requests. A
hearing being held is not approval, and approval is not payment. No payment date has been announced.
Money in settlements of this shape is distributed only after final approval and after any appeals
are resolved, and there is no way to know in advance whether an appeal will be filed.
For more class actions keep scrolling below.
Settlement Amount
$980,000
includes up to $326,634 in attorneys' fees and $10,000 in service awards, subject to Court approval
Case Title
Burton, et al. v. Berman & Rabin, P.A.
docketed as In re Berman & Rabin Data Breach Litigation
Case Number
2:25-cv-02051-DDC-GEB
Court
U.S. District Court, District of Kansas
Final Approval Hearing
September 11, 2026
date and time may change without further notice
Free settlement alerts
Get notified when new class actions open to claims
Join thousands of readers who get the latest class action settlements you may qualify for — delivered straight to your inbox.