By Steve Levine
Published: June 16, 2026
Status
Proposed Settlement · Awaiting Preliminary Approval
Settlement Fund
$32,000,000
Non-reversionary · paid by GoodRx and Criteo · divided pro rata among valid claims
Who's Covered
U.S. GoodRx users before April 20, 2024
Anyone who used a GoodRx website, app, or service — including GoodRx Gold, GoodRx Care, and HeyDoctor
Can I Claim?
Not yet — no claim form is open
A claim window opens only if the court grants preliminary approval; deadline set at 60 days after notice
GoodRx Holdings, Inc. and advertising-technology firm Criteo Corp. have agreed to pay $32 million to
resolve a privacy class action over how GoodRx handled its users' sensitive health information. The
case is captioned Jane Doe et al. v. GoodRx Holdings, Inc., et al., No. 3:23-cv-00501-AMO, in
the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The amended settlement agreement was
signed November 19, 2025, and the settlement papers were filed with the court on June 1, 2026. As of
this writing, the settlement is awaiting the court's preliminary approval, so there is nothing to
claim yet.
GoodRx is a telehealth and prescription-coupon company used by millions of people each month for
discount coupons, telehealth visits, and other health services. The plaintiffs allege that, when
people used GoodRx, the company collected personal and health information — including details about
their prescriptions and health conditions, email addresses, and phone numbers — and then disclosed
that data to advertising and analytics companies through tracking technologies embedded on the
GoodRx platform. Those technologies included standard JavaScript pixels, software development kits
(SDKs), cookies, and application programming interfaces (APIs) provided by Criteo, Meta Platforms,
and Google. The plaintiffs further allege that the third parties used the information for their own
advertising purposes.
GoodRx and Criteo deny the allegations and deny that they violated any law. They agreed to settle to
avoid the expense and uncertainty of continued litigation. A settlement is a compromise; it is not a
finding or admission of wrongdoing by either company.
The consolidated complaint asserts a range of privacy and consumer-protection claims, including
intrusion upon seclusion, unjust enrichment, negligence, and violations of the California
Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (CMIA), the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA), the
California Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL), New York's
General Business Law, and the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act. According
to the plaintiffs, much of the alleged data sharing occurred roughly between 2017 and 2020.
The lawsuit followed a February 1, 2023 enforcement action by the Federal Trade Commission, which
alleged GoodRx shared users' personal and health information with third parties in violation of the
FTC Act and the agency's Health Breach Notification Rule. That FTC matter — the first enforcement
action ever brought under the Health Breach Notification Rule — is separate from this private class
action and this settlement.
Under the proposed deal, GoodRx and Criteo will pay a combined, non-reversionary $32,000,000 into a
settlement fund. "Non-reversionary" means no unclaimed money goes back to the companies once the
settlement takes effect. The fund pays for settlement notice and administration, taxes, court-approved
attorneys' fees and expenses, and service awards for the class representatives; whatever remains — the
net settlement fund — is split pro rata, meaning each person who files a valid, timely claim receives
an equal share. The exact per-person amount will depend on how many people file.
The proposed claim form lets class members choose how to be paid: PayPal, Venmo, Zelle, a virtual
prepaid card, or a mailed paper check. Class members will be able to file online or by mail once the
claim period opens.
Class Counsel have said they will ask the court to approve attorneys' fees of up to one-third of the
fund (about $10.67 million) plus litigation expenses, and service awards of up to $2,000 for each
named plaintiff. The court decides those amounts separately from whether it approves the settlement
itself.
The proposed settlement class is all natural persons in the United States who used any website,
app, or service made available by or through GoodRx at any time prior to April 20, 2024. That
includes the main GoodRx website and app as well as GoodRx Gold, GoodRx Care, and HeyDoctor.
Excluded from the class are GoodRx and its affiliates, officers, and directors; Meta and Google; the
people who opt out; and the judges presiding over the case and their staff.
This settlement resolves the case only as to GoodRx and Criteo. The plaintiffs' claims against Meta
Platforms and Google — the two "Remaining Defendants" — are not part of this $32 million agreement
and continue in the same litigation. In other words, a separate resolution or trial involving Meta
and Google could still follow.
The next step is the court's decision on preliminary approval. If the court grants it, a
court-appointed settlement administrator will send notice to class members (largely by email),
launch the official settlement website, and open the claim window. Under the agreement, notice goes
out within 45 days of preliminary approval, and the claim deadline, opt-out deadline, and objection
deadline are all set at 60 days after that notice date. A final approval hearing would be scheduled
at least 150 days after preliminary approval.
There is no claim form yet, and no firm date — the timeline only starts once the court grants
preliminary approval, which had not happened as of June 2026. Using the deadlines written into the
settlement agreement, here is the rough sequence to expect:
- Preliminary approval — the trigger. Everything below is measured from this date.
- Notice + claim form go live — within 45 days after preliminary approval. This is when the official settlement website opens and class members can start filing.
- Claim deadline — 60 days after the notice date (so roughly 90–105 days after preliminary approval). Opt-out and objection deadlines fall on the same 60-day mark.
- Final approval hearing — at least 150 days after preliminary approval.
- Payments — issued within 45 days after the settlement's "effective date," which only arrives after final approval and the passing of any appeal period.
In plain terms: if a court grants preliminary approval, the claim form would typically open within
about a month and a half, and the window to file would stay open for roughly two months after
that. These are estimates based on the agreement's timetable, not court-ordered dates — the exact
schedule is set by the judge and posted on the official settlement website. We'll update this page
with the real claim-open date and deadline as soon as they're announced.
The official settlement website is expected to be GoodRxPrivacySettlement.com,
which will post the notice, claim form, and key dates once the case reaches that stage. Until then,
there is no claim form to fill out and no deadline to meet. We'll update this page as the schedule is
set.
This privacy case is part of a broader wave of health-app data-sharing class actions. For a
settlement that has already opened, see our coverage of the
Flo period-tracker privacy settlement,
which raised similar pixel- and SDK-based data-sharing claims.
Is there anything to claim right now?
No. The settlement is awaiting preliminary approval as of June 2026. No claim form is open and no
deadlines are set yet.
How much will each person get?
It isn't known yet. The net fund is split equally among everyone who files a valid claim, so the
per-person payment depends on the number of claims.
Will I have to upload receipts or records?
Based on the proposed claim form, the main requirement is a sworn attestation that you used a GoodRx
website, app, or service in the U.S. before April 20, 2024, plus your payment choice. Mailed notices
will carry a Claimant Code and Confirmation Code. Final requirements are set when the court approves
the notice.
Does this affect my claims against Meta or Google?
No. The release in this settlement covers GoodRx and Criteo only. The case against Meta and Google
continues.
Is the GoodRx settlement legitimate?
Yes — it's a real proposed settlement in Jane Doe et al. v. GoodRx Holdings, Inc., No.
3:23-cv-00501-AMO (N.D. Cal.), still subject to court approval. When the claim period opens, file
only through the official settlement website. Treat any unsolicited message asking for payment or
bank logins as a red flag.
What is the GoodRx settlement claim deadline?
None is set yet. Once notice goes out, the claim, opt-out, and objection deadlines all land 60 days
after the notice date. The official settlement website will post the exact dates when claims open.
How will I know when I can file?
If the court grants preliminary approval, a settlement administrator will email notice to identifiable
GoodRx users and launch the official settlement website with the claim form and deadlines. You can
also check back here for updates.
- Amended Class Action Settlement Agreement and Release, Jane Doe et al. v. GoodRx Holdings, Inc., et al., No. 3:23-cv-00501-AMO (N.D. Cal.), filed June 1, 2026 (ECF No. 357-2).
- Consolidated Class Action Complaint, Jane Doe et al. v. GoodRx Holdings, Inc., et al., No. 3:23-cv-00501-AMO (N.D. Cal.), filed May 26, 2023.
- U.S. Federal Trade Commission press release and complaint, FTC v. GoodRx Holdings, Inc. (Feb. 1, 2023).
How Do I Find Class Action Settlements?
Find all the latest class actions you can qualify for by getting notified of new lawsuits as soon as they are open to claims:
For more class actions keep scrolling below.
Status
Proposed Settlement · Awaiting Preliminary Approval
Case Title
Jane Doe et al. v. GoodRx Holdings, Inc., et al.
Case Number
3:23-cv-00501-AMO
Court
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
Settlement Fund
$32,000,000 (GoodRx & Criteo)
Date Filed
May 26, 2023