False Advertising · Lawsuit Filed

Dunkin’ Sued Over “Zero Sugar” Energy Drinks Sweetened With Allulose

Published October 11, 2026

People who bought Dunkin’ Zero energy drinks since March 2026 may be covered by a proposed class action alleging Dunkin’ markets them as “zero sugar” and “0g of sugar” even though each is sweetened mainly with allulose, which the suit says is a sugar. No class has been certified and there is nothing to file yet.

A Dunkin’ gift card in a store, representing the Dunkin’ Zero allulose lawsuit
▼ Allegations Only · No Settlement Yet

This article describes a class action complaint. The statements below are unproven allegations. Dunkin’ Brands, Inc. and Inspire Brands, Inc. have not been found liable, there is no certified class, and nothing to claim at this time. This page is informational and is not legal advice.

What Is This About?

A Chicago woman filed a proposed class action against Dunkin’ Brands, Inc. and its parent, Inspire Brands, Inc., on September 30, 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, where Dunkin’ is based. The case is Wells v. Dunkin’ Brands, Inc., No. 1:26-cv-14463.

The complaint targets Dunkin’ Zero, a line of sparkling energy drinks Dunkin’ introduced on March 4, 2026. Dunkin’ promotes the line as “zero sugar” and says a medium has “0g of sugar, 145mg of caffeine, and 20 calories.” The complaint says the drinks are sweetened mainly with allulose, which it argues is a sugar under federal labeling rules, so the “zero sugar” claims are false. According to Boston.com, Dunkin’ did not immediately respond to a request for comment, and none of the claims have been proven.

Status Complaint Filed Filed September 30, 2026 · D. Mass. · no class certified
Allulose Per Drink (Complaint’s Estimate) About 9 grams in a medium, 11–13 in a large A “zero sugar” claim requires under 0.5 grams of sugars per serving
Who It Covers (Proposed) U.S. buyers since March 4, 2026, plus an Illinois subclass
Can I Claim? No — nothing to claim yet

Which Drinks Are Named?

The complaint covers every drink sold under the Dunkin’ Zero name, in all sizes: The complaint says the drinks are sold at about 10,000 Dunkin’ restaurants in the United States. The plaintiff says she bought them two to three times a week at a Chicago drive-through, relying on the menu boards and signs that called them zero sugar.

What Dunkin’s Own Guides Show, According to the Complaint

The complaint quotes Dunkin’s published ingredient guide. Each Dunkin’ Zero is sparkling water plus one or more flavored syrups whose ingredients begin “Water, Allulose,” followed by flavors, caffeine sources and other ingredients present at 2% or less, including stevia extract.

Dunkin’s nutrition guide lists 0 grams of total and added sugars for every Dunkin’ Zero, but between 8 and 13 grams of total carbohydrate depending on size and flavor. Because allulose is the only ingredient that contributes carbohydrate in more than trace amounts, the complaint estimates about 9 grams of allulose in a medium and 11 to 13 grams in a large. Dunkin’ does not list allulose separately.

Why Allulose Matters

FDA rules allow a “sugar free” or “zero sugar” claim only if a food has less than 0.5 grams of sugars per serving, and define sugars as all free mono- and disaccharides. The complaint says allulose is a monosaccharide, so it counts. In guidance finalized in 2020, the FDA said it would not object if manufacturers left allulose out of the Total Sugars and Added Sugars lines on nutrition labels; plaintiffs in these cases argue that guidance does not cover front-of-package or menu claims.

The complaint relies on the Seventh Circuit’s July 2026 decision in Franco v. Chobani, LLC, which held that allulose is a sugar under the federal definition. Dunkin’ is the latest of more than a dozen brands sued over allulose since then; OCA’s allulose lawsuit tracker lists them, including the similar suits over Liquid I.V. Sugar-Free and BodyArmor Flash I.V.

Who Is in the Proposed Class?

The complaint proposes a nationwide class of everyone in the United States who bought a Dunkin’ Zero at a Dunkin’ restaurant for personal, family or household use from March 4, 2026 through class certification, and an Illinois subclass of buyers at Illinois restaurants.

It brings claims under the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act for the Illinois subclass, and for breach of express warranty under Massachusetts law, negligent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment for the nationwide class. It says the plaintiff plans to add a claim under Massachusetts’s consumer protection law, Chapter 93A, after a required notice period. It seeks damages, restitution and an order requiring corrected advertising.

What Happens Next?

Dunkin’ has not yet answered the complaint, and the court has not ruled on whether the claims can go forward. There is no settlement, no certified class and no claim form.

Questions

Which Dunkin’ drinks are in the lawsuit?

Every drink sold under the Dunkin’ Zero name, in all sizes: Blackberry Tangerine, Tropical Mango, Juicy Peach, Glamberry, Sunzest and Blushpop, introduced March 4, 2026, and the Watermelon Lime, Splashberry, Heatwave and Melon Paradise varieties added later.

How much allulose is in a Dunkin’ Zero?

Dunkin’ does not list allulose separately. The complaint estimates about 9 grams in a medium and 11 to 13 grams in a large, based on the total carbohydrates in Dunkin’s nutrition guide and its ingredient lists, where allulose follows water in each Dunkin’ Zero syrup. Dunkin’s guide lists 0 grams of total and added sugars.

Who is covered by the Dunkin’ Zero lawsuit?

The complaint proposes a nationwide class of people who bought Dunkin’ Zero drinks at a Dunkin’ restaurant for personal use since March 4, 2026, plus an Illinois subclass. No class has been certified.

Is there any money to claim from the Dunkin’ lawsuit?

No. There is no settlement, certified class or claim form. If the case settles or a class is certified, class members would be notified of any way to take part.

Sources

• Class Action Complaint — Wells v. Dunkin’ Brands, Inc., U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, Case No. 1:26-cv-14463 (filed September 30, 2026), via CourtListener: Complaint (PDF)
• Boston.com, “Dunkin’ says its drinks have zero sugar. One woman says that’s misleading.” (October 6, 2026): Boston.com
• FDA, “The Declaration of Allulose and Calories from Allulose on Nutrition and Supplement Facts Labels” (Guidance for Industry, October 2020): FDA Guidance

For more class actions keep scrolling below.
Status Complaint Filed
Case Title Wells v. Dunkin’ Brands, Inc.
Case Number 1:26-cv-14463
Court U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts
Date Filed September 30, 2026
Proposed Class U.S. buyers of Dunkin’ Zero since March 4, 2026, plus an Illinois subclass

Related Lawsuits & Investigations