People who lost money to cryptocurrency investment scams after clicking ads on Facebook or Instagram may be covered by a proposed class action alleging Meta and Instagram helped create, optimize and target those ads while profiting from them. No class has been certified and there is nothing to file yet.
Allegations Only · No Settlement Yet
This article describes a class action complaint. The statements below are unproven allegations. Meta Platforms, Inc. and Instagram, LLC have not been found liable, there is no certified class, and nothing to claim at this time. This page is informational and is not legal advice.
What Is This About?
Three people who lost money to cryptocurrency investment scams sued Meta Platforms, Inc. and Instagram, LLC on September 3, 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is Dassanayake v. Meta Platforms, Inc., No. 3:26-cv-09521.The complaint does not just say scammers used Facebook and Instagram. It alleges Meta’s own advertising tools, including generative AI features, helped write and refine the scam ads, that Meta’s targeting steered them to users likely to fall for them, and that Meta knowingly kept running ads it had flagged as likely fraud because they made money. The case was just filed; Meta has not been found liable and the court has not ruled on anything.
Free settlement alerts
Get notified when new class actions open to claims
Join thousands of readers who get the latest class action settlements you may qualify for — delivered straight to your inbox.
How the Scams Worked, According to the Complaint
The complaint describes the same pattern for each plaintiff. A user clicked a crypto investing ad on Facebook or Instagram, often one impersonating a celebrity, a well-known investor or a real exchange. The user was then sent to a WhatsApp “investment group,” where members recommended stocks and then directed the user to open an account on a purported crypto trading platform and fund it.The balances on those platforms appeared to grow, and small early withdrawals were sometimes allowed to build trust. When the users tried to take out larger sums, the money was gone. One plaintiff says she moved more than $225,000 in crypto to such platforms; another says he moved $50,000. One also says that after she was scammed, Facebook began showing her ads from “recovery” services aimed at people who had lost money, and that when she reported a scam ad, Meta reviewed it and left it up.
What the Complaint Says Meta Did
The complaint makes three main allegations about Meta’s role:• Building the ads. It says Meta’s ad tools, including Advantage+ creative, dynamic creative and the flexible ad format, generate and test variations of an advertiser’s text and images, including with generative AI, so scam ads were refined by Meta’s own systems to drive engagement.
• Targeting the ads. It says Meta’s algorithms showed the ads to users who had shown interest in crypto and investing, and that a user who clicked one scam ad was more likely to be shown others.
• Profiting knowingly. Relying largely on Reuters reporting about internal Meta documents, it alleges Meta estimated it shows users about 15 billion scam ads a day and earns about $7 billion a year from them, bans advertisers only when its systems are at least 95% sure they are committing fraud, and charges suspected scammers below that line higher ad rates, which the complaint says Meta calls “penalty bids,” instead of rejecting their ads.
The complaint also says Meta’s terms of service and advertising policies promise users that ads are reviewed and harmful ones removed, which is the basis for its contract claims. These allegations have not been tested in court. The complaint’s emphasis on Meta’s own tools appears designed to get around Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which generally shields platforms from liability for content others post; how a court treats that argument is likely to decide whether the case goes forward.
What the Lawsuit Seeks
The complaint asks for compensatory damages for class members’ losses, restitution and disgorgement, punitive damages, interest and attorneys’ fees. It also asks for a court order stopping Meta from telling users it reviews and removes harmful ads while knowingly letting them run, and for Meta to pay for class notice and administration.Who Would Be Covered?
The proposed nationwide class is all people and entities that saw advertisements on Facebook or Instagram and lost money investing in crypto scams that resulted from them. The complaint proposes three sub-classes, one for Facebook, one for Instagram and one for ads made with Meta’s ad tools, plus an injunctive-relief class of all current Facebook and Instagram users, which would seek changes to Meta’s practices rather than money. The complaint estimates class members in the millions. No class has been certified.This is a separate case from the Consumer Federation of America’s scam ads lawsuit against Meta, filed in District of Columbia Superior Court in April 2026.
What Happens Next
The case was first assigned to a magistrate judge; after a party declined to proceed before one, it is being reassigned to a district judge. An initial case management conference is set for December 7, 2026. A motion to dismiss is the usual next step in a case like this. There is nothing to file and no deadline for consumers. OCA will update this page as the case develops.Questions
Who would be covered by the Meta crypto scam ads lawsuit?
The proposed nationwide class is people and businesses that saw crypto investment ads on Facebook or Instagram and lost money investing in the scams those ads led to. There are sub-classes for Facebook, for Instagram and for ads built with Meta’s ad tools, and a separate injunctive-relief class of all current Facebook and Instagram users. No class has been certified.
How did the scams in the Meta lawsuit work?
According to the complaint, users who clicked crypto ads were invited into WhatsApp “investment groups,” told to open accounts on purported crypto trading platforms and to fund them, and shown growing balances. Small early withdrawals were sometimes allowed to build trust. When the users tried to withdraw larger amounts, the money was gone.
Is this the same as the Consumer Federation of America lawsuit against Meta?
No. The Consumer Federation of America sued Meta over scam ads in District of Columbia Superior Court in April 2026 under D.C.’s consumer protection law. This is a separate federal class action filed in California by individual scam victims seeking money for their losses.
Can I get money from the Meta scam ads lawsuit now?
No. The case was filed on September 3, 2026 and is at the complaint stage. There is no settlement, no claim form and no deadline. Money would only be available if the case settles or the plaintiffs win.
Sources
• Class action complaint, Dassanayake v. Meta Platforms, Inc., No. 3:26-cv-09521 (N.D. Cal., filed September 3, 2026), the source of every allegation above.• The case docket on CourtListener.
